Why Northern Ireland’s Institutions Need Stability

      Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

      Published

      View graph of relations

      Northern Ireland’s consociational institutions were reviewed by a committee of its Assembly in 2012–13. The arguments of both critics and exponents of the arrangements are of general interest to scholars of comparative politics, powersharing and constitutional design. The authors of this article review the debates and evidence on the d’Hondt rule of executive formation, political designation, the likely impact of changing district magnitudes for assembly elections, and existing patterns of opposition and accountability. They evaluate the scholarly, political and legal literature before commending the merits of maintaining the existing system, including the rules under which the system might be modified in future.

      Documents

      DOI

      Original languageEnglish
      Number of pages29
      Pages (from-to)30-58
      JournalGovernment and Opposition
      Journal publication dateJan 2016
      Issue number1
      Volume51
      Early online date11 Aug 2014
      DOIs
      StatePublished - Jan 2016

        Research areas

      • Northern Ireland, consociationism, voting

      ID: 5481254