Description
AACA invited me to join the Abstract Review Committee requesting my collaboration in reviewing the annual conference abstracts. . As a reviewer, I should either to accept or reject the abstract. I was asked to recommend the appropriate presentation format (i.e., Platform, Tech Fair, or Poster), and whether it should be posted electronically on the Clinical Anatomy website. Reviews completed to be returned online via our software, Planstone. The abstract review process is central to a successful scientific meeting,Kathleen Bubb, 2026 Program Secretary and Adam Kolatorowicz, 2026 Co-Meeting Manager - Thank you for agreeing to review abstracts for the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists to be held at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota in June 2026. We are impressed with your commitment to assist with this process and by how quickly you responded to our request for help. Your effort helps make the annual meeting a success and your assistance ensures an engaging and productive meeting
Members who submit work that is less mature was invited to present their research at the annual meeting (usually via poster) and gain feedback from the process, but the abstract will not be posted electronically on the Clinical Anatomy site. I have indicated why I felt this way in the comment box of the survey. This designation was for the benefit of the review committee. Likewise, if I rejected an abstract, I indicated the reason for rejection in the comment box of the survey.
| Period | 01 Mar 2025 → 24 Mar 2027 |
|---|---|
| Degree of Recognition | International |