Complicity Issues and Redress for Victims in the Aftermath of Jesner v Arab Bank plc

Press/Media: Other

Description

In April 2018, the US Supreme Court ruled that foreign corporations could not be held liable under the Alien Tort Claims Act for complicity in human rights abuses against foreign claimants.  This blog post was written in response to this and considers the impact of this decision on the future potential for remedying corporate harm through tort law, and of the wider implications on business and human rights. 

Period30 Apr 2018

Media contributions

1

Media contributions

  • TitleComplicity Issues and Redress for Victims in the aftermath of Jesner v Arab Bank plc
    Degree of recognitionInternational
    Media name/outletRights As Usual (Blog)
    Media typeWeb
    CountryNetherlands
    Date30/04/2018
    DescriptionInvited contribution to the RightsAsUsual blog hosted by Prof. Nadia Bernaz.
    Producer/AuthorHackett, O'Kelly, Patton, Moffett
    URLrightsasusual.com/?p=1215
    PersonsCiara Hackett, Ciarán O'Kelly, Clare Patton, Luke Moffett

Keywords

  • Business and Human Rights
  • Jesner
  • Arab Bank plc
  • Complicity
  • Alien Tort Claims Act
  • Alien Tort Statute