Abstract
To date there is no gold standard for sampling microplastics. Zooplankton sampling methods, such as plankton and Neuston nets, are commonly used to estimate the concentrations of microplastics in seawater, but their ability to detect microplastics is limited by their mesh size. We compared different net-based sampling methods with different mesh sizes including bongo nets (>500 μm), manta nets (>300 μm) and plankton nets (>200 μm and >400 μm) to 1 litre bottle grabbed, filtered (0.45 μm) samples. Concentrations of microplastics estimated using net-based methods were ~3 orders of magnitude less than those estimated by 1 litre grab samples. Some parts of the world with low human populations, such as Ascension Island and the Falkland Islands, lack baseline data on microplastics. Using the bottle grab sampling method we found that microplastic litter was present at these remote locations and was comparable to levels of contamination in more populated coastal regions, such as the United Kingdom.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 695-701 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Marine Pollution Bulletin |
Volume | 137 |
Early online date | 15 Nov 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Dec 2018 |
Keywords
- Anthropogenic litter
- Atlantic Ocean
- Grab samples
- Microfibres
- Nets
- Remote
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oceanography
- Aquatic Science
- Pollution