A comparison of three approaches to compute the effective Reynolds number of the implicit large-eddy simulations

Ye Zhou*, Ben Thornber

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The implicit large-eddy simulation (ILES) has been utilized as an effective approach for calculating many complex flows at high Reynolds number flows. Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) induced flow can be viewed as a homogeneous decaying turbulence (HDT) after the passage of the shock. In this article, a critical evaluation of three methods for estimating the effective Reynolds number and the effective kinematic viscosity is undertaken utilizing high-resolution ILES data. Effective Reynolds numbers based on the vorticity and dissipation rate, or the integral and inner-viscous length scales, are found to be the most self-consistent when compared to the expected phenomenology and wind tunnel experiments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number070905
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Fluids Engineering
Volume138
Issue number7
Early online date12 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of three approaches to compute the effective Reynolds number of the implicit large-eddy simulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this