A cost-effectiveness comparison of the NICE 2015 and WHO 2013 diagnostic criteria for women with gestational diabetes with and without risk factors

Paul Brian Jacklin, Michael Ja Maresh, Chris C Patterson, Katharine P Stanley, Anne Dornhorst, Shona Burman-Roy, Rudy W Bilous

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
310 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the cost-effectiveness (CE) of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2015 and the WHO 2013 diagnostic thresholds for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

SETTING: 

The analysis was from the perspective of the National Health Service in England and Wales.

PARTICIPANTS: 

6221 patients from four of the Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study centres (two UK, two Australian), 6308 patients from the Atlantic Diabetes in Pregnancy study and 12 755 patients from UK clinical practice.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES PLANNED: 

The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), net monetary benefit (NMB) and the probability of being cost-effective at CE thresholds of £20 000 and £30 000 per QALY.

RESULTS:

 In a population of pregnant women from the four HAPO study centres and using NICE-defined risk factors for GDM, diagnosing GDM using NICE 2015 criteria had an NMB of £239 902 (relative to no treatment) at a CE threshold of £30 000 per QALY compared with WHO 2013 criteria, which had an NMB of £186 675. NICE 2015 criteria had a 51.5% probability of being cost-effective compared with the WHO 2013 diagnostic criteria, which had a 27.6% probability of being cost-effective (no treatment had a 21.0% probability of being cost-effective). For women without NICE risk factors in this population, the NMBs for NICE 2015 and WHO 2013 criteria were both negative relative to no treatment and no treatment had a 78.1% probability of being cost-effective.

CONCLUSION: 

The NICE 2015 diagnostic criteria for GDM can be considered cost-effective relative to the WHO 2013 alternative at a CE threshold of £30 000 per QALY. Universal screening for GDM was not found to be cost-effective relative to screening based on NICE risk factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e016621
JournalBMJ Open
Volume7
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A cost-effectiveness comparison of the NICE 2015 and WHO 2013 diagnostic criteria for women with gestational diabetes with and without risk factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this