A rapid systematic review of public responses to health messages encouraging vaccination against infectious diseases in a pandemic or epidemic

Sadie Lawes-Wickwar *, Daniela Ghio, Mei Yee Tang, Chris Keyworth, Sabina Stanescu, Juliette Westbrook, Elizabeth Jenkinson, Angelos P Kassianos, Daniel Scanlan, Natalie Garnett, Lynn Laidlaw, Neil Howlett, Natalie Carr, Natalia Stanulewicz, Ella Guest, Daniella Watson, Lisa Sutherland, Lucie Byrne-Davis, Angel Chater, Jo HartChristopher Armitage, Gillian Shorter, Vivian Swanson, Tracy Epton

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract: Public health teams need to understand how the public responds to vaccination messages in a pandemic or epidemic to inform successful campaigns encouraging the uptake of new vaccines as they become available. A rapid systematic review was performed by searching PsycINFO, MEDLINE, healthevidence.org, OSF Preprints and PsyArXiv Preprints in May 2020 for studies including at least one health message promoting vaccine uptake of airborne-, droplet- and fomite- spread viruses. Included studies were assessed for quality using the MMAT or AMSTAR, and for patient and public involvement (PPI) in the research. Thirty-five articles were included. Most reported messages for seasonal influenza (n=11; 31%) or H1N1 (n=11; 31%). Evidence from moderate to high quality studies for improving vaccine uptake included providing information about virus risks and vaccination safety, as well as addressing vaccine misunderstandings, offering vaccination reminders, including vaccination clinic details, and delivering mixed media campaigns across hospitals or communities. Behavioural influences (beliefs and intentions) were improved when: shorter, risk-reducing or relative risk framing messages were used; the benefits of vaccination to society were emphasised; and beliefs about capability and concerns among target populations (e.g. vaccine safety) were addressed. Clear, credible, messages in language target groups can understand were associated with higher acceptability. Two studies (6%) described PPI in the research process. Future campaigns should consider the beliefs and information needs of target populations in their design, including ensuring vaccine eligibility and availability is clear, and messages are accessible. More high quality research is needed to demonstrate the effects of messaging interventions on actual vaccine uptake.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)72
JournalVaccines
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted - 14 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • vaccines
  • vaccine hesitancy
  • behaviour change
  • health psychology
  • systematic review

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A rapid systematic review of public responses to health messages encouraging vaccination against infectious diseases in a pandemic or epidemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this