Abandoning "abandonment" for the implied release of easements: Annetts v Adeleye

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Comments on Annetts v Adeleye (CA) on whether abandonment of a right of way was effected by the conveyance of the dominant tenement subject to a covenant requiring the purchaser to fence the boundary between the dominant tenement and the access land. Considers what kind of a divesting intention would be sufficient to effect abandonment and the preferability of taking a different approach to abandonment of easements than to abandonment generally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-296
Number of pages8
JournalThe Conveyancer and Property Lawyer
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Abandoning "abandonment" for the implied release of easements: Annetts v Adeleye'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this