Abstract
Comments on Annetts v Adeleye (CA) on whether abandonment of a right of way was effected by the conveyance of the dominant tenement subject to a covenant requiring the purchaser to fence the boundary between the dominant tenement and the access land. Considers what kind of a divesting intention would be sufficient to effect abandonment and the preferability of taking a different approach to abandonment of easements than to abandonment generally.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 289-296 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer |
Volume | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 2018 |