Accountability and representation: Nonstate actors in UN climate diplomacy

J.W. Kuyper, K. Bäckstrand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)


Observer organizations in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are clustered into nine constituency groups. Each constituency has a “focal point” (representative) to mediate between the Secretariat and the 1800 NGOs admitted during each Conference of the Parties meeting by collating information, coordinating interactions, offering logistical support, and providing collective representation. Drawing upon a series of interviews with constituency groups and other qualitative data, we explore how the focal point of each constituency group remains accountable to the observer organizations he or she represents. We make two major contributions. First, we map the accountability mechanisms that exist between the observer organizations and focal points in each constituency. Second, we argue that variation in the usage of accountability mechanisms across constituencies corresponds to the existence of parallel bodies operating outside the UNFCCC. This article speaks to broader issues of accountability and representation in global climate governance. © 2016 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-81
JournalGlobal Environmental Politics
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 11 May 2016

Bibliographical note

Cited By :4

Export Date: 19 September 2018

References: Andonova, L., Betsill, M., Bulkeley, H., Transnational Climate Governance (2009) Global Environmental Politics, 9 (2), pp. 52-73; Bäckstrand, K., Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships (2008) Global Environmental Politics, 8 (3), pp. 74-102; Betsill, M.M., Corell, E., NGO Influence in International Environmental Negotiations: A Framework for Analysis (2001) Global Environmental Politics, 1 (4), pp. 65-85; Betsill, M.M., Corell, E., (2008) NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Non-Governmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations, , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., Zelli, F., The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis (2009) Global Environmental Politics, 9 (4), pp. 14-40; Bond, P., (2012) Politics of Climate Justice: Paralysis Above, Movement Below, , South Africa: University of KwaZulu Natal Press; Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M., Newell, P., Vandeveer, S., (2014) Transnational Climate Change Governance, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Campbell, L.M., Corson, C., Gray, N.J., Macdonald, K.I., Peter Brosius, J., Studying Global Environmental Meetings to Understand Global Environmental Governance: Collaborative Event Ethnography at the Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (2014) Global Environmental Politics, 14 (3), pp. 1-20; Ciplet, D., Contesting Climate Injustice: Transnational Advocacy Network Struggles for Rights in UN Climate Politics (2014) Global Environmental Politics, 14 (4), pp. 75-96; (2012) Our Network Rules and Guiding Principles for Network Governance, ,, last accessed March 28, 2015; (2014) CAN Intervention: Joint High Level Segment of COP and CMP, ,, last accessed March 11, 2015; Dombrowski, K., Filling the Gap? An Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Responses to Participation and Representation Deficits in Global Climate Governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics (2010) Law and Economics, 10 (4), pp. 397-416; Summary of the Paris Climate Change Conference: 29 November to 13 December 2015 (2015) Earth Negotiation Bulletin, 12 (663), pp. 1-47; Fisher, D., COP-15 in Copenhagen: How the Merging of Movement Left Civil Society Out of the Cold (2010) Global Environmental Politics, 10 (2), pp. 11-17; Ford, L., Challenging Global Environmental Governance: Social Movements Agency and Global Civil Society (2003) Global Environmental Politics, 3 (2), pp. 120-134; Friedman, E., Hochstetler, K., Clark, A.M., (2005) Sovereignty, Democracy and Global Civil Society: State-Society Relations at UN World Conference, , New York: State University of New York Press; Gareau, B.J., The Limited Influence of Global Civil Society: International Environmental Non-Governmental Organisations and the Methyl Bromide Controversy in the Montreal Protocol (2012) Environmental Politics, 21 (1), pp. 88-107; Grant, R., Keohane, R.O., Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics (2005) American Political Science Review, 99 (1), pp. 29-44; Green, J., Rethinking Private Authority (2014) Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance, , Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; Hadden, J., Explaining Variation in Transnational Climate Change Activism: The Role of Inter-Movement Spill-Over (2014) Global Environmental Politics, 14 (2), pp. 7-25; Hadden, J., (2015) Networks in Contention: The Divisive Politics of Climate Change, , New York: Cambridge University Press; Keck, M., Sikkink, K., (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, , Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; Keohane, R., Victor, D., The Regime Complex for Climate Change (2011) Perspectives on Politics, 9 (1), pp. 7-23; Kruse, J., Women’s Representation in the UN Climate Change Negotiations (2014) International Environmental Agreements, 14 (4), pp. 349-370; Lipschutz, R., (1996) Global Civil Society and Global Environmental Governance, , Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; Methmann, C., Rothe, D., Benjamin, S., (2013) Interpretative Approaches to Global Climate Governance: (De)Constructing the Greenhouse, , London: Routledge; Muñoz Cabré, M., Issue-Linkage to Climate Change Measured Through NGO Participation in the UNFCCC (2011) Global Environmental Politics, 11 (3), pp. 10-22; Newell, P., Civil Society, Corporate Accountability and the Politics of Climate Change (2008) Global Environmental Politics, 8 (3), pp. 122-153; Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., Schroeder, H., Conceptualizing Climate Governance Beyond the International Regime (2009) Global Environmental Politics, 9 (1), pp. 58-78; Schroeder, H., Boykoff, M.T., Spiers, L., Equity and State Representations in Climate Negotiations (2012) Nature Climate Change, 2 (12), pp. 834-836; Sending, O.J., Neumann, I.B., Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power (2006) International Studies Quarterly, 50 (3), pp. 651-672; Stevenson, H., Dryzek, J.S., (2014) Democratizing Global Climate Governance, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Stripple, J., Bulkeley, H., (2013) Governing the Climate: New Approaches to Governmentality, Power and Politics, , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; (2014) Trade Unions at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, ,, last accessed September 18, 2015; (2014) Non-Governmental Organization Constituencies, ,, last accessed February 20, 2015; (2015) Constituency Focal Point/Contact Details, ,, last accessed October 25, 2015; Wapner, P., (1996) Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics, , Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; Willetts, P., (2011) Non-Governmental Organizations in World Politics: The Construction of Global Governance, , London: Routledge; (2014) Can Lima Close the Gap?, ,, No, Not That One!, last accessed September 20, 2015; (2015) Charter of the Women’s and Gender Constituency, ,, last accessed January 30, 2016; (2013) Focal Point Mandate, ,, last accessed January 5, 2015


  • accountability
  • global climate
  • logistics
  • nongovernmental organization
  • qualitative analysis
  • United Nations
  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change


Dive into the research topics of 'Accountability and representation: Nonstate actors in UN climate diplomacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this