Accuracy of trained rural ophthalmologists versus non-medical image graders in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy in rural China.

Martha McKenna, Tingting Chen, Helen McAneney, Miguel Angel Vazquez Membrillo, Ling Jin, Wei Xiao, Tunde Peto, Mingguang He, Ruth Hogg, Nathan Congdon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
337 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background/aims: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of trained rural ophthalmologists and non-medical image graders in the assessment of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in rural China. Methods: Consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus were examined from January 2014 to December 2015 at ten county-level facilities in rural Southern China. Trained rural ophthalmologists performed a complete eye examination, recording diagnoses using the United Kingdom National Diabetic Eye Screening Programme (NDESP) classification system. Two field, mydriatic, 45° digital photographs were made by nurses using NDESP protocols, and graded by trained graders with no medical background using the NDESP system. A fellowship-trained retina specialist graded all images in masked fashion and served as reference standard. Results: Altogether, 375 participants (mean age 60 +/-10 years, 48% men) were examined and 1277 images graded. Grader sensitivity (0•82-0•94 (median 0•88)) and specificity (0•91-0•99 (median 0•98)), reached or exceeded NDESP standards (sensitivity 80%, specificity 95%) in all domains except specificity detecting any DR. Rural ophthalmologists’ sensitivity was 0•65-0•95 (median 0•66) and specificity 0•59-0•95 (median 0•91). There was strong agreement between graders and the reference standard (kappa=0•84-0•87, P<0•001) and weak-moderate agreement between rural doctors and the reference (kappa= 0•48-0•64, P<0•001). Conclusion: This is the first study of diagnosticaccuracy in DR grading among non-medical graders orophthalmologists in low-income and middle-incomecountries. Non-medical graders can achieve highlevels of accuracy, whereas accuracy of trained ruralophthalmologists is not optimal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1471-1476
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume102
Issue number11
Early online date04 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Oct 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of trained rural ophthalmologists versus non-medical image graders in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy in rural China.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this