Advance care plan barriers in older patients with end-stage renal disease: A qualitative nephrologist interview study

Julien O'Riordan*, Helen Noble, P. M. Kane, Andrew Smyth

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)
62 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: Older patients with end-stage renal disease are willing participants in advance care planning but just over 10% are engaged in this process. Nephrologists fear such conversations may upset patients and so tend to avoid these discussions. This approach denies patients the opportunity to discuss their end-of-life care preferences. Many patients endure medically intensive end-of-life scenarios as a result. This study aims to explore the rationale underpinning nephrologists' clinical decision-making in the management of older patients with end-stage renal disease and to make recommendations that inform policymakers and enhance advance care planning for this patient group. Methods: A qualitative interview study of 20 nephrologists was undertaken. Nephrologists were asked about their management of end-stage renal disease in older patients, conservative management, dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care. Eligible participants were nephrologists working in Ireland. Five nephrologists participated in a recorded focus group and 15 nephrologists participated in individual digitally recorded telephone interviews. Semistructured interviews were conducted; thematic analysis was used to distil the results. Results: Three key themes emerged: barriers to advance care planning; barriers to shared decision-making; and avoidance of end-of-life care discussion. Conclusions: Advance care planning is not an integral part of the routine care of older patients with end-stage renal disease. Absence of formal training of nephrologists in how to communicate with patients contributes to poor advance care planning. Nephrologists lack clinical experience of conservatively managing end-stage renal disease and end-of-life care in older patients. Key policy recommendations include formal communication skills training for nephrologists and development of the conservative management service.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Early online date25 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 25 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Chronic Kidney Failure
Advance Care Planning
Interviews
Terminal Care
Nephrologists
Focus Groups
Ireland
Fear
Dialysis
Decision Making
Patient Care
Communication

Keywords

  • advance care planning
  • conservative management
  • dialysis withdrawal
  • end-of-life care
  • end-stage renaldisease (ESRD)
  • qualitative

Cite this

@article{f2e285d843144db9aa36b68dcc3c0546,
title = "Advance care plan barriers in older patients with end-stage renal disease: A qualitative nephrologist interview study",
abstract = "Objectives: Older patients with end-stage renal disease are willing participants in advance care planning but just over 10{\%} are engaged in this process. Nephrologists fear such conversations may upset patients and so tend to avoid these discussions. This approach denies patients the opportunity to discuss their end-of-life care preferences. Many patients endure medically intensive end-of-life scenarios as a result. This study aims to explore the rationale underpinning nephrologists' clinical decision-making in the management of older patients with end-stage renal disease and to make recommendations that inform policymakers and enhance advance care planning for this patient group. Methods: A qualitative interview study of 20 nephrologists was undertaken. Nephrologists were asked about their management of end-stage renal disease in older patients, conservative management, dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care. Eligible participants were nephrologists working in Ireland. Five nephrologists participated in a recorded focus group and 15 nephrologists participated in individual digitally recorded telephone interviews. Semistructured interviews were conducted; thematic analysis was used to distil the results. Results: Three key themes emerged: barriers to advance care planning; barriers to shared decision-making; and avoidance of end-of-life care discussion. Conclusions: Advance care planning is not an integral part of the routine care of older patients with end-stage renal disease. Absence of formal training of nephrologists in how to communicate with patients contributes to poor advance care planning. Nephrologists lack clinical experience of conservatively managing end-stage renal disease and end-of-life care in older patients. Key policy recommendations include formal communication skills training for nephrologists and development of the conservative management service.",
keywords = "advance care planning, conservative management, dialysis withdrawal, end-of-life care, end-stage renaldisease (ESRD), qualitative",
author = "Julien O'Riordan and Helen Noble and Kane, {P. M.} and Andrew Smyth",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001759",
language = "English",
journal = "BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care",
issn = "2045-4368",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

Advance care plan barriers in older patients with end-stage renal disease: A qualitative nephrologist interview study. / O'Riordan, Julien; Noble, Helen; Kane, P. M.; Smyth, Andrew.

In: BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, 25.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advance care plan barriers in older patients with end-stage renal disease: A qualitative nephrologist interview study

AU - O'Riordan, Julien

AU - Noble, Helen

AU - Kane, P. M.

AU - Smyth, Andrew

PY - 2019/6/25

Y1 - 2019/6/25

N2 - Objectives: Older patients with end-stage renal disease are willing participants in advance care planning but just over 10% are engaged in this process. Nephrologists fear such conversations may upset patients and so tend to avoid these discussions. This approach denies patients the opportunity to discuss their end-of-life care preferences. Many patients endure medically intensive end-of-life scenarios as a result. This study aims to explore the rationale underpinning nephrologists' clinical decision-making in the management of older patients with end-stage renal disease and to make recommendations that inform policymakers and enhance advance care planning for this patient group. Methods: A qualitative interview study of 20 nephrologists was undertaken. Nephrologists were asked about their management of end-stage renal disease in older patients, conservative management, dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care. Eligible participants were nephrologists working in Ireland. Five nephrologists participated in a recorded focus group and 15 nephrologists participated in individual digitally recorded telephone interviews. Semistructured interviews were conducted; thematic analysis was used to distil the results. Results: Three key themes emerged: barriers to advance care planning; barriers to shared decision-making; and avoidance of end-of-life care discussion. Conclusions: Advance care planning is not an integral part of the routine care of older patients with end-stage renal disease. Absence of formal training of nephrologists in how to communicate with patients contributes to poor advance care planning. Nephrologists lack clinical experience of conservatively managing end-stage renal disease and end-of-life care in older patients. Key policy recommendations include formal communication skills training for nephrologists and development of the conservative management service.

AB - Objectives: Older patients with end-stage renal disease are willing participants in advance care planning but just over 10% are engaged in this process. Nephrologists fear such conversations may upset patients and so tend to avoid these discussions. This approach denies patients the opportunity to discuss their end-of-life care preferences. Many patients endure medically intensive end-of-life scenarios as a result. This study aims to explore the rationale underpinning nephrologists' clinical decision-making in the management of older patients with end-stage renal disease and to make recommendations that inform policymakers and enhance advance care planning for this patient group. Methods: A qualitative interview study of 20 nephrologists was undertaken. Nephrologists were asked about their management of end-stage renal disease in older patients, conservative management, dialysis withdrawal and end-of-life care. Eligible participants were nephrologists working in Ireland. Five nephrologists participated in a recorded focus group and 15 nephrologists participated in individual digitally recorded telephone interviews. Semistructured interviews were conducted; thematic analysis was used to distil the results. Results: Three key themes emerged: barriers to advance care planning; barriers to shared decision-making; and avoidance of end-of-life care discussion. Conclusions: Advance care planning is not an integral part of the routine care of older patients with end-stage renal disease. Absence of formal training of nephrologists in how to communicate with patients contributes to poor advance care planning. Nephrologists lack clinical experience of conservatively managing end-stage renal disease and end-of-life care in older patients. Key policy recommendations include formal communication skills training for nephrologists and development of the conservative management service.

KW - advance care planning

KW - conservative management

KW - dialysis withdrawal

KW - end-of-life care

KW - end-stage renaldisease (ESRD)

KW - qualitative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068174123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001759

DO - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001759

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85068174123

JO - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

JF - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

SN - 2045-4368

ER -