Advance care planning with patients who have end-stage kidney disease a systematic realist review

Peter O'Halloran, Helen Noble, Kelly Norwood, Peter Maxwell, Joanne Shields, Damian Fogarty, Fliss Murtagh, Rachael Morton, Kevin Brazil

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)
227 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Patients with end-stage kidney disease have a high mortality rate and disease burden. Despite this, many do not speak with healthcare professionals about end-of-life issues. Advance care planning is recommended in this context but is complex and challenging. We carried out a realist review to identify factors affecting its implementation.

OBJECTIVES: 1. To identify implementation theories. 2. To identify factors that help or hinder implementation. 3. To develop theory on how the intervention may work.

METHODS: Systematic realist review, searching seven electronic databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Science Direct.

RESULTS: 62 papers were included in the review.

CONCLUSION: We identified two intervention stages. 1. Training for healthcare professionals that addresses concerns, optimises skills, and clarifies processes. 2. Use of documentation and processes that are simple, individually tailored, culturally appropriate, and involve surrogates. These processes work as patients develop trust in professionals, participate in discussions, and clarify values and beliefs about their condition. This leads to greater congruence between patient and surrogate; increased quality of communication between patients and professionals; and increased completion of advance directives. Advance care planning is hindered by lack of training; administrative complexities; pressures of routine care; patients overestimating life-expectancy; and when patients, family, and/or clinical staff are reluctant to initiate discussions. It is more likely to succeed where organisations treat it as core business; when the process is culturally appropriate and takes account of patient perceptions; and when patients are willing to consider death and dying with suitably trained staff.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Early online date16 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusEarly online date - 16 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Advance Care Planning
Chronic Kidney Failure
Delivery of Health Care
Advance Directives
Life Expectancy
Documentation
Libraries
Communication
Organizations
Databases
Pressure

Cite this

@article{39871a80355c408581ed3dc5db4024e6,
title = "Advance care planning with patients who have end-stage kidney disease a systematic realist review",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Patients with end-stage kidney disease have a high mortality rate and disease burden. Despite this, many do not speak with healthcare professionals about end-of-life issues. Advance care planning is recommended in this context but is complex and challenging. We carried out a realist review to identify factors affecting its implementation.OBJECTIVES: 1. To identify implementation theories. 2. To identify factors that help or hinder implementation. 3. To develop theory on how the intervention may work.METHODS: Systematic realist review, searching seven electronic databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Science Direct.RESULTS: 62 papers were included in the review.CONCLUSION: We identified two intervention stages. 1. Training for healthcare professionals that addresses concerns, optimises skills, and clarifies processes. 2. Use of documentation and processes that are simple, individually tailored, culturally appropriate, and involve surrogates. These processes work as patients develop trust in professionals, participate in discussions, and clarify values and beliefs about their condition. This leads to greater congruence between patient and surrogate; increased quality of communication between patients and professionals; and increased completion of advance directives. Advance care planning is hindered by lack of training; administrative complexities; pressures of routine care; patients overestimating life-expectancy; and when patients, family, and/or clinical staff are reluctant to initiate discussions. It is more likely to succeed where organisations treat it as core business; when the process is culturally appropriate and takes account of patient perceptions; and when patients are willing to consider death and dying with suitably trained staff.",
author = "Peter O'Halloran and Helen Noble and Kelly Norwood and Peter Maxwell and Joanne Shields and Damian Fogarty and Fliss Murtagh and Rachael Morton and Kevin Brazil",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.008",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Advance care planning with patients who have end-stage kidney disease a systematic realist review. / O'Halloran, Peter; Noble, Helen; Norwood, Kelly; Maxwell, Peter; Shields, Joanne; Fogarty, Damian; Murtagh, Fliss; Morton, Rachael; Brazil, Kevin.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 16.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advance care planning with patients who have end-stage kidney disease a systematic realist review

AU - O'Halloran, Peter

AU - Noble, Helen

AU - Norwood, Kelly

AU - Maxwell, Peter

AU - Shields, Joanne

AU - Fogarty, Damian

AU - Murtagh, Fliss

AU - Morton, Rachael

AU - Brazil, Kevin

N1 - Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2018/7/16

Y1 - 2018/7/16

N2 - CONTEXT: Patients with end-stage kidney disease have a high mortality rate and disease burden. Despite this, many do not speak with healthcare professionals about end-of-life issues. Advance care planning is recommended in this context but is complex and challenging. We carried out a realist review to identify factors affecting its implementation.OBJECTIVES: 1. To identify implementation theories. 2. To identify factors that help or hinder implementation. 3. To develop theory on how the intervention may work.METHODS: Systematic realist review, searching seven electronic databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Science Direct.RESULTS: 62 papers were included in the review.CONCLUSION: We identified two intervention stages. 1. Training for healthcare professionals that addresses concerns, optimises skills, and clarifies processes. 2. Use of documentation and processes that are simple, individually tailored, culturally appropriate, and involve surrogates. These processes work as patients develop trust in professionals, participate in discussions, and clarify values and beliefs about their condition. This leads to greater congruence between patient and surrogate; increased quality of communication between patients and professionals; and increased completion of advance directives. Advance care planning is hindered by lack of training; administrative complexities; pressures of routine care; patients overestimating life-expectancy; and when patients, family, and/or clinical staff are reluctant to initiate discussions. It is more likely to succeed where organisations treat it as core business; when the process is culturally appropriate and takes account of patient perceptions; and when patients are willing to consider death and dying with suitably trained staff.

AB - CONTEXT: Patients with end-stage kidney disease have a high mortality rate and disease burden. Despite this, many do not speak with healthcare professionals about end-of-life issues. Advance care planning is recommended in this context but is complex and challenging. We carried out a realist review to identify factors affecting its implementation.OBJECTIVES: 1. To identify implementation theories. 2. To identify factors that help or hinder implementation. 3. To develop theory on how the intervention may work.METHODS: Systematic realist review, searching seven electronic databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Science Direct.RESULTS: 62 papers were included in the review.CONCLUSION: We identified two intervention stages. 1. Training for healthcare professionals that addresses concerns, optimises skills, and clarifies processes. 2. Use of documentation and processes that are simple, individually tailored, culturally appropriate, and involve surrogates. These processes work as patients develop trust in professionals, participate in discussions, and clarify values and beliefs about their condition. This leads to greater congruence between patient and surrogate; increased quality of communication between patients and professionals; and increased completion of advance directives. Advance care planning is hindered by lack of training; administrative complexities; pressures of routine care; patients overestimating life-expectancy; and when patients, family, and/or clinical staff are reluctant to initiate discussions. It is more likely to succeed where organisations treat it as core business; when the process is culturally appropriate and takes account of patient perceptions; and when patients are willing to consider death and dying with suitably trained staff.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.07.008

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30025939

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

ER -