Advancing Research on Men and Reproduction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
334 Downloads (Pure)


While feminist scholarship has centred reproduction in women’s lives, it has inadequately explored its meanings in men’s. If we assume that reproduction happens in relationships of one kind or another between males and females, then missing men is a considerable oversight. Although there is now much research on fatherhood,merely focussing on this end-stage assumes that women take care of all of the foreplay, leaving unanswered questions in relation, inter alia, to men’s desires for parenthood,men’s involvement in planning or lack of planning to have children, the way men struggle or cope with infertility, their encounters with new reproductive technologies and surrogate mothers, their experiences of foetal screening, their involvement in abortion decision-making, and their experiences of becoming or not becoming a father. In this article I argue that men have compelling experiences throughout the reproductive trajectory deserving of more attention. I offer a profeminist theoretical composition for advancing further enquiries on men and reproduction,which begins with the feminism-informed Critical Studies of Men and Masculinities (CSM), and then weaves this together with the theories of intimate citizenship, sociology of the body, and the sociology of science and technology. I will propose how concepts from these collective theories may be useful in opening up layered questions about gender relations, intimacy, bodies, and technologies in future studies of men and reproduction.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Men's Health
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015


  • Men, masculinities, reproduction, feminist theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Professions(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Psychology(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Advancing Research on Men and Reproduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this