Abstract
A critical examination of the resurgence of Artificial Intelligence in the courts generally, and in the context of constitutional courts in particular. Reviewing two recent accounts of how AI may be used in the Courtroom to potentially replace human judges, the paper argues that the essentially social and political nature of 'judging' makes such an endeavour doomed to failure.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 01 Feb 2022 |
| Event | International Association of Constitutional Law (IACL) Round Table on the Impact of Digitalization on Constitutional Law - Copenhagen, Denmark Duration: 31 Jan 2022 → 01 Feb 2022 |
Conference
| Conference | International Association of Constitutional Law (IACL) Round Table on the Impact of Digitalization on Constitutional Law |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Denmark |
| City | Copenhagen |
| Period | 31/01/2022 → 01/02/2022 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- artificial intelligence, law, technology, intellectual property
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'AI Judges and Constitutions: ‘Tattered Fragments of the Map’: an Invited Paper to the International Association of Constitutional Law Round Table on the Impact of Digitalization on Constitutional Law (February 1, 2022)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver