Algal epiphytes of Zostera marina: Variation in assemblage structure from individual leaves to regional scale

Mark Johnson, M. Edwards, F. Bunker, Christine Maggs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data from a hierarchical study of four Zostera marina beds in Wales were used to identify the spatial scales of variation in epiphyte assemblages. There were significant within and among bed differences in assemblage structure. The differences in assemblage structure with spatial scale generally persisted when species identifications were aggregated into functional groups. There was also significant within and among bed variability in Zostera density and average length. Local variations in Zostera canopy variables at the quadrat scale (total leaf length, average leaf length and leaf density per quadrat) were not related to epiphyte species richness nor to the structure of the assemblage. In contrast, individual leaf length was significantly related to species richness in two of the beds and the structure of epiphyte assemblages was always related to individual leaf lengths. The absence of links between quadrat scale measurements of canopy variables and assemblage structure may reflect the high turnover of individual Zostera leaves. Experimental work is required to discriminate further between the potential causes of epiphyte assemblage variation within and between beds. No bed represented a refuge where a rare species was abundant. If a species was uncommon at the bed scale, it was also uncommon in beds where it occurred. The heterogeneous assemblages found in this study suggest that a precautionary approach to conservation is advisable.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-26
Number of pages15
JournalAquatic Botany
Volume82
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Algal epiphytes of Zostera marina: Variation in assemblage structure from individual leaves to regional scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this