Amateurs versus Professionals: Explaining the Political (in)Experience of Canadian Members of Parliament

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
367 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In contrast to many democracies that lament the rise of professional politicians, ‘amateur’ politicians have typically dominated federal politics in Canada. What explains this general lack of political experience among Canadian members of parliament (MPs)? This study tests three hypotheses on career development by analysing individual-level data on over 1000 MPs elected to the Canadian Parliament between 1993 and 2015. Conceptualising politics as a career path in its own right, it finds that at the key stages of establishing, maintaining and disengaging from a federal political career, there are specific challenges facing candidates and MPs in the Canadian context that are not significantly ameliorated by the possession of prior political experience. This leaves little incentive for individuals to work in the field of politics itself before standing for federal office.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-655
Number of pages23
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Political Careers
  • Political Experience
  • Professional Politicians
  • Representation
  • Career Development Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Amateurs versus Professionals: Explaining the Political (in)Experience of Canadian Members of Parliament'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this