An extensible benchmark and tooling for comparing reverse engineering approaches

David Cutting, Joost Noppen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Various tools exist to reverse engineer software source code and generate design information, such as UML projections. Each has specific strengths and weaknesses, however no standardised benchmark exists that can be used to evaluate and compare their performance and effectiveness in a systematic manner. To facilitate such comparison in this paper we introduce the Reverse Engineering to Design Benchmark (RED-BM), which consists of a comprehensive set of Java-based targets for reverse engineering and a formal set of performance measures with which tools and approaches can be analysed and ranked. When used to evaluate 12 industry standard tools performance figures range from 8.82\% to 100\% demonstrating the ability of the benchmark to differentiate between tools. To aid the comparison, analysis and further use of reverse engineering XMI output we have developed a parser which can interpret the XMI output format of the most commonly used reverse engineering applications, and is used in a number of tools.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)115-124
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal on Advances in Software
Volume8
Issue number1&2
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2015

Bibliographical note

The published article is copyrighted using a Creative Commons "Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike" license

M1 - 62023

Keywords

  • Reverse Engineering
  • Benchmarking
  • Tool Comparison
  • Tool Support
  • Extensible Methods
  • XMI
  • Software Comprehension
  • UML
  • UML Reconstruction

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An extensible benchmark and tooling for comparing reverse engineering approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this