An introduction to critical ADHD studies

Andrew Ivan Brown*, Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, David Jackson-Perry

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

With this chapter, we lay out—necessarily partially—some key elements of the ADHD research field. After summarizing research concerned, albeit often in differing ways, with pathology and diagnosis, we move on to look in some detail at ‘alternative’ narratives of ADHD. Through a consideration of strength-based and cognitive difference approaches, we move towards a tentative notion of what a Critical ADHD Studies (CADS) might resemble, noting points of comparison and divergence with Critical Autism Studies (CAS) as we go. We suggest a summary of elements that CADS could work towards: the epistemic value of situated knowledge; the need for intersectionality and interdisciplinarity; a critical eye on behavioural norms and their role in conceptualizing and pathologizing ADHD; and a need to ‘unknow’ and to ‘relearn’ what we think we know about ADHD. Within CAS, considerable tensions have arisen from sometimes exclusive (re-)definitions of what CAS is or should be. Here, we explicitly avoid laying claim to a definitive definition of CADS. Rather, we seek out points of articulation between approaches holding potential for epistemically and ethically just ways that ADHDers might be centred as agents, and ADHD discourse ‘re-storied.’
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Palgrave handbook of research methods and ethics in neurodiversity studies
EditorsHanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, David Jackson-Perry
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter3
Pages41-57
ISBN (Electronic)9783031661273
ISBN (Print)9783031661266
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Sept 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An introduction to critical ADHD studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this