Anonymous vs. Non-Anonymous Backchannels: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review


Promoting learner engagement in large cohorts is a well-known problem. One solution adopted in the lecture space is ‘backchannel’ software, which provides an online chat facility that operates alongside the delivery of other learning activities. While this provides some protection from the collective gaze of a class, backchannels often display information about a message author, which may discourage them from participating. Accordingly, this session will present the findings of an investigation into the impact of anonymity on backchannel engagement with a large student cohort. Subsequently, despite some misuse, this evaluation found that preserving anonymity is an important feature for many learners and its absence can result in a significant reduction in engagement with a backchannel.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2019
EventHigher Education Academy STEM Conference - Birmingham, United Kingdom
Duration: 30 Jan 201931 Jan 2019


ConferenceHigher Education Academy STEM Conference
Abbreviated titleHEA STEM
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom


Dive into the research topics of 'Anonymous vs. Non-Anonymous Backchannels: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this