Architecture as Pedagogy: Alive and Kicking

Ruth Morrow, George Lovett, David McClean

    Research output: Contribution to conferenceOther contribution to conferencepeer-review

    Abstract

    This workshop draws on an emerging collaborative body of research by Lovett, Morrow and McClean that aims to understand architecture and its processes as a form of pedagogical practice: a civic pedagogy.

    Architectural education can be valued not only as a process that delivers architecture-specific skills and knowledges, but also as a process that transforms people into critically active contributors to society. We are keen to examine how and where those skills are developed in architectural education and trace their existence and/or application within practice. We intend to examine whether some architectural and spatial practices are intrinsically pedagogical in their nature and how the level of involvement of clients, users and communities can mimic the project-based learning of architectural education – in particularly in the context of ‘live project learning’

    1. This workshop begins with a brief discussion paper from Morrow that sets out the arguments behind why and how architecture can be understood as pedagogy. It will do so by presenting firstly the relationship between architectural practice and pedagogy, drawing out both contemporary and historical examples of architecture and architects acting pedagogically. It will also consider some other forms of creative practice that explicitly frame themselves pedagogically, and focus on participatory approaches in architectural practice that overlap with inclusive and live pedagogies, concluding with a draft and tentative abstracted pedagogical framework for architectural practice.

    2. Lovett will examine practices of architectural operation that have a pedagogical approach, or which recognise within themselves an educational subtext/current. He is most interested in a 'liveness' beyond the 'Architectural Education' of university institutions. The presentation will question the scope for both spatial empowerment / agency and a greater understanding and awareness of the value of good design when operating as architects with participant-clients younger than 18, older than 25 or across varied parts of society. Positing that the learning might be greatest when there are no prescribed 'Learning Outcomes' and that such work might depend on risk-taking and playfulness, the presentation will be a curated showcase drawing on his own ongoing work.

    Both brief presentations will inform the basis of the workshop’s discussion which hopes to draw on participants views and expereinces to enrich the research process. The intention is that the overall workshop will lead to a call for contributors and respondents to a forthcoming publication on ‘Architecture as Pedagogy’.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 03 Sept 2014
    EventAssociation of Architectural Educators International Conference 2014 - University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Duration: 03 Sept 201405 Sept 2014

    Conference

    ConferenceAssociation of Architectural Educators International Conference 2014
    Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
    CitySheffield
    Period03/09/201405/09/2014

    Keywords

    • Architecture
    • Pedagogy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Architecture as Pedagogy: Alive and Kicking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this