Are causal and intervention judgments inextricably linked? A developmental study.

Caren Frosch, Teresa McCormack, David Lagnado, Patrick Burns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)


The application of the formal framework of causal Bayesian Networks to children's causal learning provides the motivation to examine the link between judgments about the causal structure of a system, and the ability to make inferences about interventions on components of the system. Three experiments examined whether children are able to make correct inferences about interventions on different causal structures. The first two experiments examined whether children's causal structure and intervention judgments were consistent with one another. In Experiment 1, children aged between 4 and 8years made causal structure judgments on a three-component causal system followed by counterfactual intervention judgments. In Experiment 2, children's causal structure judgments were followed by intervention judgments phrased as future hypotheticals. In Experiment 3, we explicitly told children what the correct causal structure was and asked them to make intervention judgments. The results of the three experiments suggest that the representations that support causal structure judgments do not easily support simple judgments about interventions in children. We discuss our findings in light of strong interventionist claims that the two types of judgments should be closely linked.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-285
JournalCognitive Science
Issue number2
Early online date03 Nov 2011
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Are causal and intervention judgments inextricably linked? A developmental study.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this