Are spatial inequalities growing? The scale of population concentrations in England and Wales

Christopher D. Lloyd*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper explores how the population of England and Wales in 2001 and in 2011 was spatially concentrated by a range of demographic, social and economic characteristics. Where members of population sub-groups tend to live apart from members of other sub-groups then the population may be regarded as geographically unequal. In the UK, debates about the north–south divide have reflected the principal geographical division in public perception, with wealth and health inequalities at the forefront. This analysis uses variograms to characterise the differences between areas over multiple spatial scales. There is evidence for stronger spatial structure (more distinct spatial patterning) in variables including car and van availability and ethnicity than in age, self-reported illness, and qualifications, and these relate to urban–rural differences in the former variables. The key contribution of the paper is in using directional variograms and variogram maps to show marked differences in population concentrations by direction with, for example, north–south differences in qualifications being (on average) greater than those in the east–west direction. However, for most variables which show increased variation (and thus suggest increased geographical inequalities) between 2001 and 2011, increases are proportionally similar in all directions. Only in the case of self-reported ill-health does the north–south (or, in this case, north west–south east) divide appear to have increased.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1318-1336
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume48
Issue number7
Early online date23 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Jul 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

variogram
qualification
ethnicity
automobile
health
illness
Group
economics
evidence

Keywords

  • census
  • Inequalities
  • segregation
  • variogram

Cite this

@article{9b8cdbd6cd0d41c1ad8945180f4acda1,
title = "Are spatial inequalities growing? The scale of population concentrations in England and Wales",
abstract = "This paper explores how the population of England and Wales in 2001 and in 2011 was spatially concentrated by a range of demographic, social and economic characteristics. Where members of population sub-groups tend to live apart from members of other sub-groups then the population may be regarded as geographically unequal. In the UK, debates about the north–south divide have reflected the principal geographical division in public perception, with wealth and health inequalities at the forefront. This analysis uses variograms to characterise the differences between areas over multiple spatial scales. There is evidence for stronger spatial structure (more distinct spatial patterning) in variables including car and van availability and ethnicity than in age, self-reported illness, and qualifications, and these relate to urban–rural differences in the former variables. The key contribution of the paper is in using directional variograms and variogram maps to show marked differences in population concentrations by direction with, for example, north–south differences in qualifications being (on average) greater than those in the east–west direction. However, for most variables which show increased variation (and thus suggest increased geographical inequalities) between 2001 and 2011, increases are proportionally similar in all directions. Only in the case of self-reported ill-health does the north–south (or, in this case, north west–south east) divide appear to have increased.",
keywords = "census, Inequalities, segregation, variogram",
author = "Lloyd, {Christopher D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0308518X15621306",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1318--1336",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "7",

}

Are spatial inequalities growing? The scale of population concentrations in England and Wales. / Lloyd, Christopher D.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 48, No. 7, 01.07.2016, p. 1318-1336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are spatial inequalities growing? The scale of population concentrations in England and Wales

AU - Lloyd, Christopher D.

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - This paper explores how the population of England and Wales in 2001 and in 2011 was spatially concentrated by a range of demographic, social and economic characteristics. Where members of population sub-groups tend to live apart from members of other sub-groups then the population may be regarded as geographically unequal. In the UK, debates about the north–south divide have reflected the principal geographical division in public perception, with wealth and health inequalities at the forefront. This analysis uses variograms to characterise the differences between areas over multiple spatial scales. There is evidence for stronger spatial structure (more distinct spatial patterning) in variables including car and van availability and ethnicity than in age, self-reported illness, and qualifications, and these relate to urban–rural differences in the former variables. The key contribution of the paper is in using directional variograms and variogram maps to show marked differences in population concentrations by direction with, for example, north–south differences in qualifications being (on average) greater than those in the east–west direction. However, for most variables which show increased variation (and thus suggest increased geographical inequalities) between 2001 and 2011, increases are proportionally similar in all directions. Only in the case of self-reported ill-health does the north–south (or, in this case, north west–south east) divide appear to have increased.

AB - This paper explores how the population of England and Wales in 2001 and in 2011 was spatially concentrated by a range of demographic, social and economic characteristics. Where members of population sub-groups tend to live apart from members of other sub-groups then the population may be regarded as geographically unequal. In the UK, debates about the north–south divide have reflected the principal geographical division in public perception, with wealth and health inequalities at the forefront. This analysis uses variograms to characterise the differences between areas over multiple spatial scales. There is evidence for stronger spatial structure (more distinct spatial patterning) in variables including car and van availability and ethnicity than in age, self-reported illness, and qualifications, and these relate to urban–rural differences in the former variables. The key contribution of the paper is in using directional variograms and variogram maps to show marked differences in population concentrations by direction with, for example, north–south differences in qualifications being (on average) greater than those in the east–west direction. However, for most variables which show increased variation (and thus suggest increased geographical inequalities) between 2001 and 2011, increases are proportionally similar in all directions. Only in the case of self-reported ill-health does the north–south (or, in this case, north west–south east) divide appear to have increased.

KW - census

KW - Inequalities

KW - segregation

KW - variogram

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975045774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0308518X15621306

DO - 10.1177/0308518X15621306

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975045774

VL - 48

SP - 1318

EP - 1336

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 7

ER -