Arsenic shoot-grain relationships in field grown rice cultivars

Gareth J Norton, M Rafiqul Islam, Guilan Duan, Ming Lei, Yongguan Zhu, Claire M Deacon, Annette C Moran, Shofiqul Islam, Fang-Jie Zhao, Jacqueline L Stroud, Steve P McGrath, Joerg Feldmann, Adam H Price, Andrew A Meharg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)


Arsenic (As) accumulation in rice grains is a risk to human health. The mechanism of transfer of As from the shoot into the grain during grain filling is unknown at present. In this study As speciation in the shoot and grains at maturity were examined, and the relationships between phosphorus (P) and As, and silicon (Si) and As were established in a wide range of cultivars grown in As contaminated field trials in Bangladesh and China. No correlations were observed between shoot and grain speciation, with the inorganic form comprising 93.0-97.0% of As in the shoot and 63.0-83.7% in the grains. The percentage of dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) was between 1.4 and 6.6% in the shoot and 14.6 and 37.0% in the grains; however, the concentrations were comparable, ranging from 0.07 to 0.26 mg kg(-1) in the shoots and 0.03 to 0.25 mg kg(-1) in the grains. A positive correlation was observed between shoot As and shoot Si, however, no correlation was observed between shoot Si and grain As. A significant negative correlation was observed between shoot P and grain As concentrations. These results suggest that the translocation of As into the grain from the shoots is potentially using P rather than Si transport mechanisms. The findings also indicate that inorganic As and DMA translocation to the grain differ considerably.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1471-7
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental science & technology
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry


Dive into the research topics of 'Arsenic shoot-grain relationships in field grown rice cultivars'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this