Asking for it. How rape myths can prejudice trials and potential solutions

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter contributes to key discussions in the context of significant proposals to help dispel rape myths, made by Gillen in his review of sexual offences trials in Northern Ireland. First, it explores the nature of rape myths and how they are sustained by media, popular culture, neoliberal ideology and entrenched psychological drives. Second, it examines how rape myths can prejudice rape trials, by influencing jurors' evaluation of consent, reasonable belief in consent and sexual history evidence. Finally, it considers possible measures to lessen the impact of rape myths on trials and questions the efficacy of Gillen's recommendations for juror education and enhanced judicial directions. This chapter explored the power and persistence of rape myths in society, perpetuated by many factors, including media, culture and deep psychological drives. Thus, rape myths cannot be definitively defeated without comprehensive cultural change.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSexual violence on trial. Local and comparative perspectives
EditorsRachel Killean, Eithne Dowds, Anne-Marie McAlinden
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter7
Pages85-96
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9780429356087
ISBN (Print)9780367404277
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 selection and editorial matter, Rachel Killan, Eithne Dowds and Anne-Marie McAlinden.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Cite this