Abstract
Background and aims Plant diversity – ecosystem processes
relationships are essential to our understanding of
ecosystem functioning. We aimed at disentangling
the nature of such relationships in a mesotrophic
grassland that was highly heterogeneous with
regards to nutrient availability.
Methods Rather than targeting primary productivity,
like most existing reports do, we focused our study on
belowground ecosystem processes. We tested three,
largely mutually exclusive, hypotheses of ecosystem
processes relationships: the redundancy hypothesis, the
insurance hypothesis and the centrifugal model
hypothesis. We sampled the grassland twice within a
single plant growing season in a spatially explicit way
and assayed the soil for nitrification, urease activity,
relative bacterial activity and a microbial community
profile based on respiration while we simultaneously
assessed plant diversity.
Results Results supported the centrifugal model. We
justify the lack of support for the other two hypotheses
on the basis of having conducted an observational study
in an environmentally heterogeneous site.
Conclusions The centrifugal model hypothesis appears
to be a very good predictive model for explaining diversity
in observational, heterogeneous studies. The specific study represents one of the few observational
studies that consider measures of ecosystem functioning
other than primary productivity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Plant and Soil |
Early online date | 08 Jan 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Early online date - 08 Jan 2018 |