Abstract
Active implantable medical devices are becoming increasingly more popular as new applications are
developed to improve patient treatment and care. Many implant applications are utilising RF
techniques to provide communication and control for electronic devices within the human body,
especially at frequencies between 400 MHz and 2.45 GHz. Physical size is an obvious and important
concern in the design of implant devices and this means that there is a need for innovation in the
design of miniaturised antenna solutions that have adequate performance in the challenging human
body environment. While there is a role for simulation and modelling, the test and characterisation of
these innovative implant antennas is another crucial factor in the development of these medical
systems. There are many issues to take into consideration that can affect the results obtained when
testing miniaturized implant antennas. For example, the local environment surrounding the antenna
affects both impedance matching and radiation performance and so the test environment, typically a
tissue equivalent phantom, is extremely important. Additionally, in practice the close proximity of the
body tissues affects the antenna’s radiation performance and introduces significant losses into the
reactive near fields that are associated with resonant antennas. This highlights not only the
importance of accurate phantom modelling and the effect of antenna coating material, but also the
source feeding techniques and characterizing its sensitivity inside the phantom.
This paper will specifically illustrate the challenges faced when conducting radiation efficiency measurements for implantable antennas when they are inserted inside a tissue representative human body phantom. Our objective is to highlight the disturbance caused by the necessary feed cable and demonstrate techniques to minimize it. Only standardized antennas were used and the measurements were conducted using a novel reverberation chamber approach to obtain highly accurate results at extremely low radiation efficiencies associated with these applications. In order to gain a better understanding, the experiment was repeated with different antennas and phantom set ups and the results clearly illustrate the factors that need to be considered when assessing the RF performance of medical implant antennas.
This paper will specifically illustrate the challenges faced when conducting radiation efficiency measurements for implantable antennas when they are inserted inside a tissue representative human body phantom. Our objective is to highlight the disturbance caused by the necessary feed cable and demonstrate techniques to minimize it. Only standardized antennas were used and the measurements were conducted using a novel reverberation chamber approach to obtain highly accurate results at extremely low radiation efficiencies associated with these applications. In order to gain a better understanding, the experiment was repeated with different antennas and phantom set ups and the results clearly illustrate the factors that need to be considered when assessing the RF performance of medical implant antennas.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - Nov 2016 |
Event | Automated RF and Microwave Measurement Society (ARMMS) Conference - Wyboston Lakes , Bedfordshire, United Kingdom Duration: 07 Nov 2016 → 08 Nov 2016 http://www.armms.org/conferences/?conference=64 |
Conference
Conference | Automated RF and Microwave Measurement Society (ARMMS) Conference |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ARMMS |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Bedfordshire |
Period | 07/11/2016 → 08/11/2016 |
Internet address |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the RF Performance of Medical Implant Antennas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Student theses
-
Antennas and propagation for intra-body channels
Author: El-Saboni, Y., Jul 2021Supervisor: Conway, G. (Supervisor) & Zelenchuk, D. (Supervisor)
Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis › Doctor of Philosophy
File