The incentive sensitisation model of obesity suggests that modification of the dopaminergic associated reward systems in the brain may result in increased awareness of food-related visual cues present in the current food environment. Having a heightened awareness of these visual food cues may impact on food choices and eating behaviours with those being most aware of or demonstrating greater attention to food-related stimuli potentially being at greater risk of overeating and subsequent weight gain. To date, research related to attentional responses to visual food cues has been both limited and conflicting. Such inconsistent findings may in part be explained by the use of different methodological approaches to measure attentional bias and the impact of other factors such as hunger levels, energy density of visual food cues and individual eating style traits that may influence visual attention to food-related cues outside of weight status alone. This review examines the various methodologies employed to measure attentional bias with a particular focus on the role that attentional processing of food-related visual cues may have in obesity. Based on the findings of this review, it appears that it may be too early to clarify the role visual attention to food-related cues may have in obesity. Results however highlight the importance of considering the most appropriate methodology to use when measuring attentional bias and the characteristics of the study populations targeted while interpreting results to date and in designing future studies.
|Number of pages||9|
|Journal||Proceedings of the Nutrition Society|
|Early online date||19 Sep 2014|
|Publication status||Published - Feb 2015|
|Event||The Nutrition Society's 23rd Annual Irish Section Postgraduate Meeting - University College , Dublin, Ireland|
Duration: 13 Feb 2014 → 14 Feb 2014
Doolan, K. J., Breslin, G., Hanna, D., & Gallagher, A. M. (2015). Attentional bias to food-related visual cues: is there a role in obesity? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 74(1), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002966511400144X