Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation

Christopher Cohrs, S. Ibler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Right-wing authoritarianism is a central construct in individual differences approaches to prejudice. Its power to predict prejudice is often attributed to perceived threat. However, the exact moderating and mediating processes involved are little understood. In two studies (Ns=53, 84), exposure to threatening versus nonthreatening information about an ethnic out-group had reliable indirect effects on prejudice in authoritarians, but not in nonauthoritarians, largely because authoritarians were more likely to perceive actual threat when they interpreted the information received to represent a threatening argument. Additionally, in Study 2, authoritarians reacted more strongly with negative emotions when they perceived actual threat.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-94
Number of pages14
JournalBASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this