Abstract
Prominent normative theories for accommodating minority national groups appeal to the value of national cultures and/or the psychology of group recognition. This article aims to show that an argument from political authority provides a better justification. Building on Joseph Raz's theory of authority, the article argues that members of minority national groups are disadvantaged in relation to their majority counterparts under standard democratic institutions; such institutions do not provide minority national groups with comparable access to the conditions for legitimate political authority. Constitutional arrangements for accommodating minority national groups—such as territorial self-government or power-sharing—are justified insofar as they might offset this disadvantage.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 354–371 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Ratio Juris |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 13 Aug 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2015 |
Keywords
- Authority
- Nationalism
- Joseph Raz
- Minorities