Abstract
Prominent normative theories for accommodating minority national groups appeal to the value of national cultures and/or the psychology of group recognition. This article aims to show that an argument from political authority provides a better justification. Building on Joseph Raz's theory of authority, the article argues that members of minority national groups are disadvantaged in relation to their majority counterparts under standard democratic institutions; such institutions do not provide minority national groups with comparable access to the conditions for legitimate political authority. Constitutional arrangements for accommodating minority national groups—such as territorial self-government or power-sharing—are justified insofar as they might offset this disadvantage.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 354–371 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Ratio Juris |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 13 Aug 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2015 |
Keywords
- Authority
- Nationalism
- Joseph Raz
- Minorities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Authority, Nationality, and Minorities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver