Autoecological approaches to resolve subjective taxonomic divisions within Arcellacea.

Andrew L. Macumber, R. Timothy Patterson, Helen M. Roe, Eduard G. Reinhardt, Lisa A. Neville, Graeme T. Swindles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Arcellacea (testate lobose amoebae) are important lacustrine environmental indicators that have been used in paleoclimatic reconstructions, assessing the effectiveness of mine tailings pond reclamation projects and for studying the effects of land use change in rural, industrial and urban settings. Recognition of ecophenotypically significant infra-specific ‘strains’ within arcellacean assemblages has the potential to enhance the utility of the group in characterizing contemporary and paleoenvironments. We present a novel approach which employs statistical tools to investigate the environmental and taxonomic significance of proposed strains. We test this approach on two identified strains: Difflugia protaeiformis Lamarck strain ‘acuminata’ (DPA), characterized by fine grained agglutination, and Difflugia protaeiformis Lamarck strain ‘claviformis’ (DPC), characterized by coarse grained agglutination. Redundancy analysis indicated that both organisms are associated with similar environmental variables. No relationship was observed between substrate particle size and abundance of DPC, indicating that DPC has a size preference for xenosomes during test construction. Thus DPC should not be designated as a distinct strain but rather form a species complex with DPA. This study elucidates the need to justify the designation of strains based on their autecology in addition to morphological stability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305-316
Number of pages12
JournalProtist
Volume165
Issue number3
Early online date22 Mar 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Autoecological approaches to resolve subjective taxonomic divisions within Arcellacea.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this