Abstract
Objective: Molecular pathology relies on identifying anomalies using PCR or analysis of DNA/RNA. This is important in solid tumours where molecular stratification of patients define targeted treatment. These molecular biomarkers rely on examination of tumour, annotation for possible macro dissection/tumour cell enrichment and the estimation of % tumour. Manually marking up tumour is error prone. Method: We have developed a method for automated tumour mark-up and % cell calculations using image analysis called TissueMark® based on texture analysis for lung, colorectal and breast (cases=245, 100, 100 respectively). Pathologists marked slides for tumour and reviewed the automated analysis. A subset of slides was manually counted for tumour
cells to provide a benchmark for automated image analysis. Results: There was a strong concordance between pathological and
automated mark-up (100 % acceptance rate for macro-dissection). We
also showed a strong concordance between manually/automatic drawn
boundaries (median exclusion/inclusion error of 91.70 %/89 %). EGFR
mutation analysis was precisely the same for manual and automated
annotation-based macrodissection. The annotation accuracy rates in
breast and colorectal cancer were 83 and 80 % respectively. Finally,
region-based estimations of tumour percentage using image analysis
showed significant correlation with actual cell counts. Conclusion: Image analysis can be used for macro-dissection to (i)
annotate tissue for tumour and (ii) estimate the % tumour cells
and represents an approach to standardising/improving molecular
diagnostics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | S329-S329 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Virchows Archiv |
Volume | 465 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Aug 2014 |