Abstract
1600 patients had complete data. The median heart ratio was 1.308 (0.15 interquartile-range), ie manual contours are bigger than automatic contour. In clinical multivariable model 1, planning target volume, age, N-stage and performance status were associated with survival. The addition of the heart ratio in Model 2, together with an interaction term, makes the model perform significantly better. The heart volume ratio has a small protective effect, ie a larger delineated manual delineated heart is associated with a reduced hazard of death. The effect is likely weak as only a volumetric heart dose constraints were used for optimisation.
Conclusion
Variability in contouring can be used as a natural experiment to test the impact of heart sparing. Larger delineations including the base of the heart are associated with reduced mortality, suggesting the importance of sparing the base of the heart.
Conclusion
Variability in contouring can be used as a natural experiment to test the impact of heart sparing. Larger delineations including the base of the heart are associated with reduced mortality, suggesting the importance of sparing the base of the heart.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | S60 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Lung Cancer |
| Volume | 178 |
| Issue number | Supplement 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 01 Apr 2023 |