Abstract
In the two decades since signing, the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) continues to generate acrimonious debate over whether it has brought about sustainable peace or fomented weak and sectarian governance institutions. In this article, I review the formation and outworking of the GFA. In so doing, I go beyond either/or analyses of the GFA to identify the complex forms of political agency it has generated, not necessarily envisioned by the Agreement's architects. I draw particular attention to the ways in which the central support beams of the Agreement-consociationalism and Europeanisation-have gradually become weakened to threaten the sustainability of power-sharing institutions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 395-416 |
| Journal | Parliamentary Affairs |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 03 Sept 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 03 Jun 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Brexit
- Consociationalism
- Devolution
- Good Friday Agreement
- Northern Ireland
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Between Conflict and Peace: An Analysis of the Complex Consequences of the Good Friday Agreement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver