Biological invasions are a population-level rather than a species-level phenomenon

Phillip J. Haubrock*, Ismael Soto, Danish A. Ahmed, Ali R. Ansari, Ali Serhan Tarkan, Irmak Kurtul, Rafael L. Macêdo, Adrián Lázaro-Lobo, Mathieu Toutain, Ben Parker, Dagmara Błońska, Simone Guareschi, Carlos Cano-Barbacil, Victoria Dominguez Almela, Demetra Andreou, Jaime Moyano, Sencer Akalın, Cüneyt Kaya, Esra Bayçelebi, Baran YoğurtçuoğluElizabeta Briski, Sadi Aksu, Özgür Emiroğlu, Stefano Mammola, Vanessa De Santis, Melina Kourantidou, Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, J. Robert Britton, Antonín Kouba, Ellen J. Dolan, Natalia I. Kirichenko, Emili García-Berthou, David Renault, Romina D. Fernandez, Sercan Yapıcı, Daniela Giannetto, Martin A. Nuñez, Emma J. Hudgins, Jan Pergl, Marco Milardi, Dmitrii L. Musolin, Ross N. Cuthbert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Biological invasions pose a rapidly expanding threat to the persistence, functioning and service provisioning of ecosystems globally, and to socio-economic interests. The stages of successful invasions are driven by the same mechanism that underlies adaptive changes across species in general—via natural selection on intraspecific variation in traits that influence survival and reproductive performance (i.e., fitness). Surprisingly, however, the rapid progress in the field of invasion science has resulted in a predominance of species-level approaches (such as deny lists), often irrespective of natural selection theory, local adaptation and other population-level processes that govern successful invasions. To address these issues, we analyse non-native species dynamics at the population level by employing a database of European freshwater macroinvertebrate time series, to investigate spreading speed, abundance dynamics and impact assessments among populations. Our findings reveal substantial variability in spreading speed and abundance trends within and between macroinvertebrate species across biogeographic regions, indicating that levels of invasiveness and impact differ markedly. Discrepancies and inconsistencies among species-level risk screenings and real population-level data were also identified, highlighting the inherent challenges in accurately assessing population-level effects through species-level assessments. In recognition of the importance of population-level assessments, we urge a shift in invasive species management frameworks, which should account for the dynamics of different populations and their environmental context. Adopting an adaptive, region-specific and population-focused approach is imperative, considering the diverse ecological contexts and varying degrees of susceptibility. Such an approach could improve and refine risk assessments while promoting mechanistic understandings of risks and impacts, thereby enabling the development of more effective conservation and management strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere17312
Number of pages20
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2024

Keywords

  • Europe
  • freshwater macroinvertebrates
  • long-term trends
  • non-native species
  • population spread
  • population-level dynamics
  • risk assessments

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Ecology
  • General Environmental Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biological invasions are a population-level rather than a species-level phenomenon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this