Abstract
An experiment with rats compared the ability of fixed and variable duration cues to produce blocking. Rats in group B (Blocking) were trained that both fixed- (F) and variable- (V) duration cues would be followed by food delivery. In a subsequent training stage F and V continued to be reinforced, but F was accompanied by X, and V by Y. In the test phase responding to X and Y was examined. Control group O (Overshadowing) received identical treatment, except that F and V were nonreinforced in the first training stage. In group B there was evidence for blocking, but only of X, which had been conditioned in compound with the fixed-duration F; there was no evidence for blocking of Y, which had been conditioned in compound with the variable-duration V. It is suggested that this result may occur because fixed cues reach a higher, more stable asymptote of associative strength than do their variable equivalents.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1964-1972 |
| Journal | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 02 Sept 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Associative learning
- Blocking
- Rats
- Stimulus distribution form
- Timing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Physiology
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- General Psychology
- Physiology (medical)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Blocking by fixed and variable stimuli: Effects of stimulus distribution on blocking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver