Abstract
This article provides the genealogy of bricolage and underscores the
modifications it has undergone within the sociologies of culture and religion.
It draws on the study of three new religious movements that teach
unconventional versions of Hinduism and kabbalah, to show that the current
understanding of bricolage in the studies of popular culture and religion overestimates
its eclectic and personal nature and neglects its sociocultural logics.
It tends to take for granted the availability of cultural resources used in
bricolage, and finally it fails to understand the social significance of
individualism, overlooking the ways in which norms and power could be
expressed through culture in the contemporary world. This article suggests
that it would be best reclaiming bricolage’s original meaning, prompting
questions about the contexts that make certain elements available, social
patterns that may organise bricolage, who ‘bricole’, what for, who is
empowered, from what and by using whose tradition.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 474 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Culture and Religion |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2014 |