Bridging neurodiversity and open scholarship: How shared values can guide best practices for research integrity, social justice, and principled education

Mahmoud M. Elsherif, Sara L. Middleton, Jenny Mai Phan, Flavio Azevedo, Bethan Iley, Magdalena Grose-Hodge, Samantha L. Tyler, Steven K. Kapp, Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Desiree Grafton-Clarke, Sui Kit Yeung, John J. Shaw, Helena Hartmann, Marie Dokovova

Research output: Other contribution

1955 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Not all people conform to what is socially construed as the norm and divergences should be expected. Neurodiversity is fundamental to the understanding of human behaviour and cognition. However, neurodivergent individuals are often stigmatised, devalued, and objectified. This position statement presents the perspectives of neurodivergent authors, the majority of whom have personal lived experiences of neurodivergence(s), and discusses how research and academia can and should be improved in terms of research integrity, inclusivity and diversity. The authors describe future directions that relate to lived experience and systematic barriers, disclosure, directions on prevalence, stigma, intersection of neurodiversity and open scholarship, and provide recommendations that can lead to personal and systematic changes to improve acceptance of neurodivergent individuals’ lived experiences within academia.
Original languageEnglish
TypePreprint
Media of outputMetaArXiv Preprint server
Number of pages88
DOIs
Publication statusUnpublished - 20 Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Academia
  • Community
  • Disability Research
  • Inclusion
  • Intersectionality
  • Neurodiversity
  • Open Scholarship
  • Open Science
  • Representation
  • Social Justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging neurodiversity and open scholarship: How shared values can guide best practices for research integrity, social justice, and principled education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this