Can identification as Muslim increase support for reconciliation? The case of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey

Gulseli Baysu, Canan Coskan, Yasin Duman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ethnic and national identities, as ingroup and superordinate identities, are key predictors for reconciliation, yet less research considers religious identity a superordinate identity. Focusing on the reconciliation of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey, this study aims to test a mediation model in which the relations between ethnic (i.e., Kurdish) and religious identifications (i.e., Muslim) and reconciliation outcomes were mediated by positive intergroup emotions. Moreover, to understand the diffusion of the conflict in a transnational context, this model is
tested both in Turkey and Belgium among Muslim Kurdish minorities (N=141). Kurdish minorities’ levels of support for reconciliation and the ways they construe reconciliation were analyzed as two outcomes. For the latter, descriptions of reconciliation were first content-coded into seven themes. A latent class analysis of these themes led to two main construals: those endorsing a rights-based versus dialogue-based understanding of reconciliation; which was then
used as a binary outcome. Results supported a similar mediation model in Turkey and Belgium. Accordingly, stronger religious identification as Muslim was associated with positive intergroup emotions and in turn more support for reconciliation, whereas stronger ethnic identification as Kurdish had the opposite effect. However, having Muslim identity as a superordinate identity was
double-edged for the Kurdish minorities: while high Muslim identifiers were more supportive of reconciliation in general; they were also less likely to endorse a rights-based understanding of reconciliation (versus a dialogue-based reconciliation).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-53
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations
Volume64
Early online date30 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Fingerprint

Islam
Turkey
reconciliation
Muslim
Belgium
Emotions
minority
mediation
Conflict (Psychology)
Identification (Psychology)
Reconciliation
Muslims
emotion
dialogue
Research
ethnic identity
national identity

Cite this

@article{1cbcb464831044d1a85ef056d41ce28a,
title = "Can identification as Muslim increase support for reconciliation? The case of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey",
abstract = "Ethnic and national identities, as ingroup and superordinate identities, are key predictors for reconciliation, yet less research considers religious identity a superordinate identity. Focusing on the reconciliation of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey, this study aims to test a mediation model in which the relations between ethnic (i.e., Kurdish) and religious identifications (i.e., Muslim) and reconciliation outcomes were mediated by positive intergroup emotions. Moreover, to understand the diffusion of the conflict in a transnational context, this model istested both in Turkey and Belgium among Muslim Kurdish minorities (N=141). Kurdish minorities’ levels of support for reconciliation and the ways they construe reconciliation were analyzed as two outcomes. For the latter, descriptions of reconciliation were first content-coded into seven themes. A latent class analysis of these themes led to two main construals: those endorsing a rights-based versus dialogue-based understanding of reconciliation; which was thenused as a binary outcome. Results supported a similar mediation model in Turkey and Belgium. Accordingly, stronger religious identification as Muslim was associated with positive intergroup emotions and in turn more support for reconciliation, whereas stronger ethnic identification as Kurdish had the opposite effect. However, having Muslim identity as a superordinate identity wasdouble-edged for the Kurdish minorities: while high Muslim identifiers were more supportive of reconciliation in general; they were also less likely to endorse a rights-based understanding of reconciliation (versus a dialogue-based reconciliation).",
author = "Gulseli Baysu and Canan Coskan and Yasin Duman",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.02.002",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "43--53",
journal = "International Journal of Intercultural Relations",
issn = "0147-1767",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Can identification as Muslim increase support for reconciliation? The case of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey. / Baysu, Gulseli; Coskan, Canan ; Duman, Yasin.

In: International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 64, 05.2018, p. 43-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can identification as Muslim increase support for reconciliation? The case of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey

AU - Baysu, Gulseli

AU - Coskan, Canan

AU - Duman, Yasin

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - Ethnic and national identities, as ingroup and superordinate identities, are key predictors for reconciliation, yet less research considers religious identity a superordinate identity. Focusing on the reconciliation of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey, this study aims to test a mediation model in which the relations between ethnic (i.e., Kurdish) and religious identifications (i.e., Muslim) and reconciliation outcomes were mediated by positive intergroup emotions. Moreover, to understand the diffusion of the conflict in a transnational context, this model istested both in Turkey and Belgium among Muslim Kurdish minorities (N=141). Kurdish minorities’ levels of support for reconciliation and the ways they construe reconciliation were analyzed as two outcomes. For the latter, descriptions of reconciliation were first content-coded into seven themes. A latent class analysis of these themes led to two main construals: those endorsing a rights-based versus dialogue-based understanding of reconciliation; which was thenused as a binary outcome. Results supported a similar mediation model in Turkey and Belgium. Accordingly, stronger religious identification as Muslim was associated with positive intergroup emotions and in turn more support for reconciliation, whereas stronger ethnic identification as Kurdish had the opposite effect. However, having Muslim identity as a superordinate identity wasdouble-edged for the Kurdish minorities: while high Muslim identifiers were more supportive of reconciliation in general; they were also less likely to endorse a rights-based understanding of reconciliation (versus a dialogue-based reconciliation).

AB - Ethnic and national identities, as ingroup and superordinate identities, are key predictors for reconciliation, yet less research considers religious identity a superordinate identity. Focusing on the reconciliation of the Kurdish conflict in Turkey, this study aims to test a mediation model in which the relations between ethnic (i.e., Kurdish) and religious identifications (i.e., Muslim) and reconciliation outcomes were mediated by positive intergroup emotions. Moreover, to understand the diffusion of the conflict in a transnational context, this model istested both in Turkey and Belgium among Muslim Kurdish minorities (N=141). Kurdish minorities’ levels of support for reconciliation and the ways they construe reconciliation were analyzed as two outcomes. For the latter, descriptions of reconciliation were first content-coded into seven themes. A latent class analysis of these themes led to two main construals: those endorsing a rights-based versus dialogue-based understanding of reconciliation; which was thenused as a binary outcome. Results supported a similar mediation model in Turkey and Belgium. Accordingly, stronger religious identification as Muslim was associated with positive intergroup emotions and in turn more support for reconciliation, whereas stronger ethnic identification as Kurdish had the opposite effect. However, having Muslim identity as a superordinate identity wasdouble-edged for the Kurdish minorities: while high Muslim identifiers were more supportive of reconciliation in general; they were also less likely to endorse a rights-based understanding of reconciliation (versus a dialogue-based reconciliation).

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.02.002

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 43

EP - 53

JO - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

JF - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

SN - 0147-1767

ER -