Capitalising on the conceptual divide: access to public and private justice in children's proceedings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

964 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article argues that the concept of a public/private divide is inappropriate in the context of children's proceedings in Northern Ireland. It highlights the problem by examining policy proposals in respect of legal aid/services, which have been structured and validated by the concept. A spectral model for understanding children's proceedings is proffered by way of a proposed replacement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-172
Number of pages18
JournalNorthern Ireland Legal Quarterly
Volume67
Issue number2
Early online date01 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Aug 2016

Bibliographical note

Conor McCormick is a PhD candidate in the School of Law, Queen's University Belfast. He holds an LL.B from Queen's University Belfast and an LL.M from Ulster University.

Keywords

  • Children
  • Children's Rights
  • Children's Proceedings
  • Family Law
  • Legal Aid
  • Public/Private Divide
  • Jurisprudence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Capitalising on the conceptual divide: access to public and private justice in children's proceedings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this