Abstract
A virtual consensus exists that Catholics fare worse than Protestants in the N. Ireland labour market. The political implications of this imbalance have been extensive since the present bloody conflict has its origins in a civil rights campaign that demanded an end to Catholic economic and social disadvantage. A range of contrasting studies has attempted to explain the causes of unequal performance between Catholics and Protestants in employment. This paper surveys the robustness of these investigations which are categorized under: (1) political explanations; (2) quasi-human capital studies; and (3) econometric and statistical assessments. It is suggested that each category has some merits, but none on its own is convincing. The paper concludes that we should adopt an eclectic approach to explaining the better employment position of Protestants.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 560-578 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Economy And Society |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 1997 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Copyright:Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Fair employment
- Human capital
- Labour market discrimination
- N. Ireland
- Religious inequality
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Catholics and Protestants in the N. Ireland labour market: Why does one group perform better than the other?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver