Abstract
Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are widely viewed as the gold standard for assessing effectiveness in health research; however many researchers and practitioners believe that RCTs are inappropriate and un-doable in social care settings, particularly in relation to looked after children. The aim of this article is to describe the challenges faced in conducting a pilot study and phase II RCT of a peer mentoring intervention to reduce teenage pregnancy in looked after children in a social care setting.
Methods: Interviews were undertaken with social care professionals and looked after children, and a survey conducted with looked after children, to establish the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and research design.
Results: Barriers to recruitment and in managing the intervention were identified, including social workers acting as informal gatekeepers; social workers concerns and misconceptions about the recruitment criteria and the need for and purpose of randomisation; resource limitations, which made it difficult to prioritise research over other demands on their time and difficulties in engaging and retaining looked after children in the study.
Conclusions: The relative absence of a research infrastructure and culture in social care and the lack of research support funding available for social care agencies, compared to health organisations, has implications for increasing evidence-based practice in social care settings, particularly in this very vulnerable group of young people.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 206 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Trials |
Volume | 16 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 07 May 2015 |
Keywords
- Trials
- Local authorities
- Looked after children
- LOCAL-AUTHORITIES
- RANDOM ALLOCATION
- CLINICAL-TRIAL
- HEALTH
- WORK
- PARTICIPATION
- INTERVENTIONS
- PARENTS
- SENSE