Abstract
Background
Early studies of common mental disorders (CMDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic mainly report increases; however, more recent findings have been mixed. Also, studies assessing the effects of restriction measures on CMDs show varied results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess changes in levels of CMDs from pre-/early to during the pandemic and the effects of restriction policies in the European population.
Methods
We searched for studies assessing both pre-pandemic and peri-pandemic self-reported emotional distress and symptoms of depression or anxiety among nationally/regionally representative samples in Europe and collected microdata from those studies. Estimates of corona containment index were related to changes in CMDs using random-effects meta-regression.
Results
Our search strategy resulted in findings from 15 datasets drawn from 8 European countries being included in the meta-analysis. There was no evidence of change in the prevalence of emotional distress, anxiety, or depression from before to during the pandemic; but from early pandemic periods to later periods, there were significant decreases in emotional distress and anxiety. Increased school restrictions and social distancing were associated with small increases in self-reported emotional distress.
Conclusions
Despite initial concerns of increased emotional distress and mental illness due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the results from this meta-analysis indicate that there was a decrease in emotional distress and no change in anxiety or depression in the general population in Europe. Overall, our findings support the importance of strong governance when implementing periodic and robust restriction measures to combat the spread of COVID-19.
Early studies of common mental disorders (CMDs) during the COVID-19 pandemic mainly report increases; however, more recent findings have been mixed. Also, studies assessing the effects of restriction measures on CMDs show varied results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess changes in levels of CMDs from pre-/early to during the pandemic and the effects of restriction policies in the European population.
Methods
We searched for studies assessing both pre-pandemic and peri-pandemic self-reported emotional distress and symptoms of depression or anxiety among nationally/regionally representative samples in Europe and collected microdata from those studies. Estimates of corona containment index were related to changes in CMDs using random-effects meta-regression.
Results
Our search strategy resulted in findings from 15 datasets drawn from 8 European countries being included in the meta-analysis. There was no evidence of change in the prevalence of emotional distress, anxiety, or depression from before to during the pandemic; but from early pandemic periods to later periods, there were significant decreases in emotional distress and anxiety. Increased school restrictions and social distancing were associated with small increases in self-reported emotional distress.
Conclusions
Despite initial concerns of increased emotional distress and mental illness due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the results from this meta-analysis indicate that there was a decrease in emotional distress and no change in anxiety or depression in the general population in Europe. Overall, our findings support the importance of strong governance when implementing periodic and robust restriction measures to combat the spread of COVID-19.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e87 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 26 Oct 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding for this research was provided through the Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (V.L, P.F., C.D., A-C.H., W.O., M.N., grant number 101016233), Nuffield Foundation; UK Research and Innovation; Wellcome Trust (D.F. F.B.); ROCKWOOL Foundation (L.H.A., PFallesen, M.C.C., grant number 1227); Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (PFallesen, grant number 2016-07099), and NIHR School for Public Health Research (EW grant reference number PD-SPH-2015). The funder had no role in the design, completion, or writing up of the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association.
Keywords
- Meta-analysis
- depression
- COVID-19 restrictions
- anxiety
- social distancing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychiatry and Mental health