Abstract
Standard pairwise meta-analysis compares 2 interventions at a time, for example, treatment A vs treatment B. By contrast, network meta-analysis (NMA) compares 3 or more interventions in a single analysis by combining direct evidence within studies and indirect evidence based on a common comparator across a network of studies. In addition to estimates of the relative effects between any pair of interventions in the network, treatment ranking is a very informative output of NMA. However, inappropriate interpretation and overinterpretation of ranking statistics can misinform clinical decision-making.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1053-1054 |
Journal | JAMA Ophthalmology |
Volume | 140 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 22 Sept 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 01 Nov 2022 |
Keywords
- Ophthalmology