Choosing intraocular lenses in patients undergoing bilateral cataract extraction - one size does not fit all

Tianjing Li*, Richard S. Davidson, Gianni Virgili

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Standard pairwise meta-analysis compares 2 interventions at a time, for example, treatment A vs treatment B. By contrast, network meta-analysis (NMA) compares 3 or more interventions in a single analysis by combining direct evidence within studies and indirect evidence based on a common comparator across a network of studies. In addition to estimates of the relative effects between any pair of interventions in the network, treatment ranking is a very informative output of NMA. However, inappropriate interpretation and overinterpretation of ranking statistics can misinform clinical decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1053-1054
JournalJAMA Ophthalmology
Volume140
Issue number11
Early online date22 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing intraocular lenses in patients undergoing bilateral cataract extraction - one size does not fit all'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this