Chronic Pain Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Pain Following Stimulator Removal

Alison M. Vargovich, Jill Chorney, Richard T. Gross, Kevin E. Vowles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND Both spinal cord stimulators (SCS) and interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program (CPRP) are evidence-based treatments for chronic pain but differ on treatment foci. SCS focuses on decreasing the subjective pain experience as a means of improving function and quality of life. CPRP focuses on addressing the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors associated with chronic pain to improve function. Due to experimental constraints, these 2 treatment options are difficult to compare; however, this case report offers a unique opportunity to examine outcomes for both interventions in a sequential manner for changes in pain, function, and mood. CASE REPORT This single case study examined the separate and sequential outcomes of SCS and CPRP in a 26-year-old patient with a work-related injury resulting in chronic upper extremity pain. This patient was treated within an interdisciplinary CPRP following failure and removal of an SCS. Outcomes were measured by psychological assessments and return-to-work through a 6-month post-CPRP follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Pain intensity decreased following SCS placement and CPRP, while pain-related distress, pain interference, and overall affect improved only after CPRP, with sustained improvements at 6-month follow-up. Patient evidenced improvement following treatment with SCS and CPRP. SCS resulted in improvement in subjective pain and modest improved self-reported activity. CPRP demonstrated marked improvement in pain, self-reported function, and mood with patient eventually returning to work and maintaining most of these gains 6-months after completing CPRP treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1373-1377
Number of pages5
JournalThe American journal of case reports
Volume19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
Chronic Pain
Rehabilitation
Pain
Spinal Cord
Therapeutics
Return to Work
Quality of Life
Psychology

Cite this

Vargovich, Alison M. ; Chorney, Jill ; Gross, Richard T. ; Vowles, Kevin E. / Chronic Pain Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Pain Following Stimulator Removal. In: The American journal of case reports. 2018 ; Vol. 19. pp. 1373-1377.
@article{e0fd58b3c3a143d484cae91329d90359,
title = "Chronic Pain Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Pain Following Stimulator Removal",
abstract = "BACKGROUND Both spinal cord stimulators (SCS) and interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program (CPRP) are evidence-based treatments for chronic pain but differ on treatment foci. SCS focuses on decreasing the subjective pain experience as a means of improving function and quality of life. CPRP focuses on addressing the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors associated with chronic pain to improve function. Due to experimental constraints, these 2 treatment options are difficult to compare; however, this case report offers a unique opportunity to examine outcomes for both interventions in a sequential manner for changes in pain, function, and mood. CASE REPORT This single case study examined the separate and sequential outcomes of SCS and CPRP in a 26-year-old patient with a work-related injury resulting in chronic upper extremity pain. This patient was treated within an interdisciplinary CPRP following failure and removal of an SCS. Outcomes were measured by psychological assessments and return-to-work through a 6-month post-CPRP follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Pain intensity decreased following SCS placement and CPRP, while pain-related distress, pain interference, and overall affect improved only after CPRP, with sustained improvements at 6-month follow-up. Patient evidenced improvement following treatment with SCS and CPRP. SCS resulted in improvement in subjective pain and modest improved self-reported activity. CPRP demonstrated marked improvement in pain, self-reported function, and mood with patient eventually returning to work and maintaining most of these gains 6-months after completing CPRP treatment.",
author = "Vargovich, {Alison M.} and Jill Chorney and Gross, {Richard T.} and Vowles, {Kevin E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.12659/AJCR.911157",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "1373--1377",
journal = "The American journal of case reports",
issn = "1941-5923",
publisher = "International Scientific Literature, Inc",

}

Chronic Pain Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Pain Following Stimulator Removal. / Vargovich, Alison M.; Chorney, Jill; Gross, Richard T.; Vowles, Kevin E.

In: The American journal of case reports, Vol. 19, 19.11.2018, p. 1373-1377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Chronic Pain Rehabilitation for Upper Extremity Pain Following Stimulator Removal

AU - Vargovich, Alison M.

AU - Chorney, Jill

AU - Gross, Richard T.

AU - Vowles, Kevin E.

PY - 2018/11/19

Y1 - 2018/11/19

N2 - BACKGROUND Both spinal cord stimulators (SCS) and interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program (CPRP) are evidence-based treatments for chronic pain but differ on treatment foci. SCS focuses on decreasing the subjective pain experience as a means of improving function and quality of life. CPRP focuses on addressing the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors associated with chronic pain to improve function. Due to experimental constraints, these 2 treatment options are difficult to compare; however, this case report offers a unique opportunity to examine outcomes for both interventions in a sequential manner for changes in pain, function, and mood. CASE REPORT This single case study examined the separate and sequential outcomes of SCS and CPRP in a 26-year-old patient with a work-related injury resulting in chronic upper extremity pain. This patient was treated within an interdisciplinary CPRP following failure and removal of an SCS. Outcomes were measured by psychological assessments and return-to-work through a 6-month post-CPRP follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Pain intensity decreased following SCS placement and CPRP, while pain-related distress, pain interference, and overall affect improved only after CPRP, with sustained improvements at 6-month follow-up. Patient evidenced improvement following treatment with SCS and CPRP. SCS resulted in improvement in subjective pain and modest improved self-reported activity. CPRP demonstrated marked improvement in pain, self-reported function, and mood with patient eventually returning to work and maintaining most of these gains 6-months after completing CPRP treatment.

AB - BACKGROUND Both spinal cord stimulators (SCS) and interdisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program (CPRP) are evidence-based treatments for chronic pain but differ on treatment foci. SCS focuses on decreasing the subjective pain experience as a means of improving function and quality of life. CPRP focuses on addressing the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors associated with chronic pain to improve function. Due to experimental constraints, these 2 treatment options are difficult to compare; however, this case report offers a unique opportunity to examine outcomes for both interventions in a sequential manner for changes in pain, function, and mood. CASE REPORT This single case study examined the separate and sequential outcomes of SCS and CPRP in a 26-year-old patient with a work-related injury resulting in chronic upper extremity pain. This patient was treated within an interdisciplinary CPRP following failure and removal of an SCS. Outcomes were measured by psychological assessments and return-to-work through a 6-month post-CPRP follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Pain intensity decreased following SCS placement and CPRP, while pain-related distress, pain interference, and overall affect improved only after CPRP, with sustained improvements at 6-month follow-up. Patient evidenced improvement following treatment with SCS and CPRP. SCS resulted in improvement in subjective pain and modest improved self-reported activity. CPRP demonstrated marked improvement in pain, self-reported function, and mood with patient eventually returning to work and maintaining most of these gains 6-months after completing CPRP treatment.

U2 - 10.12659/AJCR.911157

DO - 10.12659/AJCR.911157

M3 - Article

C2 - 30449882

AN - SCOPUS:85056589377

VL - 19

SP - 1373

EP - 1377

JO - The American journal of case reports

JF - The American journal of case reports

SN - 1941-5923

ER -