Citizen Participation: A Critical Look at the Democratic Adequacy of Government Consultations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
602 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Consultation procedures are used increasingly in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. This account looks critically at consultation as presently practiced, and suggests that consulters and consultees need to do much more to ensure both the participatory validity and democratic value of such exercises. The possibility of a “right to be consulted” is examined. Some ideas from a governmentality perspective are developed, using the growth of localism as an example, to suggest that consultation is often a very structured interaction: the actual operation of participation mechanisms may not always create a space for an equal exchange between official and participant views. Examples of best practice in consultation are examined before consideration is given to recent case law from the UK seeking to establish basic ground rules for how consultations should be organized. Finally the promise of consultation to reinvigorate democracy is evaluated and weighed against the correlative risk of “participatory disempowerment”
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)636-659
JournalOxford Journal of Legal Studies
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 06 Sept 2017

Keywords

  • consultation, governmentality, localism, democracy, participatory disempowerment, participation, e-consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Citizen Participation: A Critical Look at the Democratic Adequacy of Government Consultations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this