Citizenship Attributes as the Basis for Intergroup Differentiation: Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Evaluations

Niamh McNamara, Orla Muldoon, Clifford Stevenson, Emer Slattery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent research (e.g. Barnes, Auburn & Lee, 2004) suggests that citizenship opportunities and resources may be afforded or denied to individuals according to their group memberships. We consider how the generic processes of intergroup differentiation by which groups are socially devalued and excluded can reflect divergent conceptualizations of citizenship among different groups. As part of a wider investigation of social exclusion, a combination of methods was used to investigate the relative intergroup perceptions of residents from more and less affluent areas in Limerick city, Ireland. Participants (n=214) completed the implicit association test and rated a fictional character on a series of citizenship-relevant dimensions. All participants displayed negative
implicit associations with designated disadvantaged areas in Limerick. The results of the explicit prejudice assessment illustrated that these negative associations are matched by a lower overall attribution of positive characteristics to residents from these areas relative to residents from a more affluent area. On examination of each group’s relative rating of traits, residents from less affluent
areas appear doubly disadvantaged as they are devalued in terms of both outgroup and ingroup understandings of citizenship attributes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-254
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
Volume21
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
citizenship
resident
evaluation
Ireland
Group
outgroup
Research
group membership
prejudice
attribution
exclusion
rating
examination
resources

Cite this

McNamara, Niamh ; Muldoon, Orla ; Stevenson, Clifford ; Slattery, Emer. / Citizenship Attributes as the Basis for Intergroup Differentiation : Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Evaluations. In: Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 243-254.
@article{299efe7a15b44091b7a635e34f15532e,
title = "Citizenship Attributes as the Basis for Intergroup Differentiation: Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Evaluations",
abstract = "Recent research (e.g. Barnes, Auburn & Lee, 2004) suggests that citizenship opportunities and resources may be afforded or denied to individuals according to their group memberships. We consider how the generic processes of intergroup differentiation by which groups are socially devalued and excluded can reflect divergent conceptualizations of citizenship among different groups. As part of a wider investigation of social exclusion, a combination of methods was used to investigate the relative intergroup perceptions of residents from more and less affluent areas in Limerick city, Ireland. Participants (n=214) completed the implicit association test and rated a fictional character on a series of citizenship-relevant dimensions. All participants displayed negativeimplicit associations with designated disadvantaged areas in Limerick. The results of the explicit prejudice assessment illustrated that these negative associations are matched by a lower overall attribution of positive characteristics to residents from these areas relative to residents from a more affluent area. On examination of each group’s relative rating of traits, residents from less affluentareas appear doubly disadvantaged as they are devalued in terms of both outgroup and ingroup understandings of citizenship attributes.",
author = "Niamh McNamara and Orla Muldoon and Clifford Stevenson and Emer Slattery",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "243--254",
journal = "Journal of Community and Applied Psychology",
issn = "1052-9284",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Citizenship Attributes as the Basis for Intergroup Differentiation : Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Evaluations. / McNamara, Niamh; Muldoon, Orla; Stevenson, Clifford; Slattery, Emer.

In: Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 05.2011, p. 243-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Citizenship Attributes as the Basis for Intergroup Differentiation

T2 - Implicit and Explicit Intergroup Evaluations

AU - McNamara, Niamh

AU - Muldoon, Orla

AU - Stevenson, Clifford

AU - Slattery, Emer

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Recent research (e.g. Barnes, Auburn & Lee, 2004) suggests that citizenship opportunities and resources may be afforded or denied to individuals according to their group memberships. We consider how the generic processes of intergroup differentiation by which groups are socially devalued and excluded can reflect divergent conceptualizations of citizenship among different groups. As part of a wider investigation of social exclusion, a combination of methods was used to investigate the relative intergroup perceptions of residents from more and less affluent areas in Limerick city, Ireland. Participants (n=214) completed the implicit association test and rated a fictional character on a series of citizenship-relevant dimensions. All participants displayed negativeimplicit associations with designated disadvantaged areas in Limerick. The results of the explicit prejudice assessment illustrated that these negative associations are matched by a lower overall attribution of positive characteristics to residents from these areas relative to residents from a more affluent area. On examination of each group’s relative rating of traits, residents from less affluentareas appear doubly disadvantaged as they are devalued in terms of both outgroup and ingroup understandings of citizenship attributes.

AB - Recent research (e.g. Barnes, Auburn & Lee, 2004) suggests that citizenship opportunities and resources may be afforded or denied to individuals according to their group memberships. We consider how the generic processes of intergroup differentiation by which groups are socially devalued and excluded can reflect divergent conceptualizations of citizenship among different groups. As part of a wider investigation of social exclusion, a combination of methods was used to investigate the relative intergroup perceptions of residents from more and less affluent areas in Limerick city, Ireland. Participants (n=214) completed the implicit association test and rated a fictional character on a series of citizenship-relevant dimensions. All participants displayed negativeimplicit associations with designated disadvantaged areas in Limerick. The results of the explicit prejudice assessment illustrated that these negative associations are matched by a lower overall attribution of positive characteristics to residents from these areas relative to residents from a more affluent area. On examination of each group’s relative rating of traits, residents from less affluentareas appear doubly disadvantaged as they are devalued in terms of both outgroup and ingroup understandings of citizenship attributes.

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 243

EP - 254

JO - Journal of Community and Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Community and Applied Psychology

SN - 1052-9284

IS - 2

ER -