TY - JOUR
T1 - Classifying exoplanet candidates with convolutional neural networks: application to the Next Generation Transit Survey
AU - Chaushev, Alexander
AU - Raynard, Liam
AU - Goad, Michael R.
AU - Eigmüller, Philipp
AU - Armstrong, David J.
AU - Briegal, Joshua T.
AU - Burleigh, Matthew R.
AU - Casewell, Sarah L.
AU - Gill, Samuel
AU - Jenkins, James S.
AU - Nielsen, Louise D.
AU - Watson, Christopher A.
AU - West, Richard G.
AU - Wheatley, Peter J.
AU - Udry, Stéphane
AU - Vines, Jose I.
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - Vetting of exoplanet candidates in transit surveys is a manual process,
which suffers from a large number of false positives and a lack of
consistency. Previous work has shown that convolutional neural networks
(CNN) provide an efficient solution to these problems. Here, we apply a
CNN to classify planet candidates from the Next Generation Transit
Survey (NGTS). For training data sets we compare both real data with
injected planetary transits and fully simulated data, as well as how
their different compositions affect network performance. We show that
fewer hand labelled light curves can be utilized, while still achieving
competitive results. With our best model, we achieve an area under the
curve (AUC) score of (95.6± {0.2}){{ per cent}} and an accuracy
of (88.5± {0.3}){{ per cent}} on our unseen test data, as well as
(76.5± {0.4}){{ per cent}} and (74.6± {1.1}){{ per cent}}
in comparison to our existing manual classifications. The neural network
recovers 13 out of 14 confirmed planets observed by NGTS, with high
probability. We use simulated data to show that the overall network
performance is resilient to mislabelling of the training data set, a
problem that might arise due to unidentified, low signal-to-noise
transits. Using a CNN, the time required for vetting can be reduced by
half, while still recovering the vast majority of manually flagged
candidates. In addition, we identify many new candidates with high
probabilities which were not flagged by human vetters.
AB - Vetting of exoplanet candidates in transit surveys is a manual process,
which suffers from a large number of false positives and a lack of
consistency. Previous work has shown that convolutional neural networks
(CNN) provide an efficient solution to these problems. Here, we apply a
CNN to classify planet candidates from the Next Generation Transit
Survey (NGTS). For training data sets we compare both real data with
injected planetary transits and fully simulated data, as well as how
their different compositions affect network performance. We show that
fewer hand labelled light curves can be utilized, while still achieving
competitive results. With our best model, we achieve an area under the
curve (AUC) score of (95.6± {0.2}){{ per cent}} and an accuracy
of (88.5± {0.3}){{ per cent}} on our unseen test data, as well as
(76.5± {0.4}){{ per cent}} and (74.6± {1.1}){{ per cent}}
in comparison to our existing manual classifications. The neural network
recovers 13 out of 14 confirmed planets observed by NGTS, with high
probability. We use simulated data to show that the overall network
performance is resilient to mislabelling of the training data set, a
problem that might arise due to unidentified, low signal-to-noise
transits. Using a CNN, the time required for vetting can be reduced by
half, while still recovering the vast majority of manually flagged
candidates. In addition, we identify many new candidates with high
probabilities which were not flagged by human vetters.
KW - methods: data analysis
KW - techniques: photometric
KW - planets and satellites: detection
U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stz2058
DO - 10.1093/mnras/stz2058
M3 - Article
SN - 0035-8711
VL - 488
SP - 5232
EP - 5250
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 4
ER -