Closed and open breathing circuit function in healthy volunteers during exercise at Mount Everest base camp (5300 m)

R.C.N. McMorrow, J.S. Windsor, Nigel Hart, Paul Richards, George Rodway, Vijay Ahuja, Michael O'Dwyer, Monty G. Mythen, Michael P. W. Grocott

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present a randomised, controlled, crossover trial of the Caudwell Xtreme Everest (CXE) closed circuit breathing system vs an open circuit and ambient air control in six healthy, hypoxic volunteers at rest and exercise at Everest Base Camp, at 5300 m. Compared with control, arterial oxygen saturations were improved at rest with both circuits. There was no difference in the magnitude of this improvement as both circuits restored median (IQR [range]) saturation from 75%, (69.5-78.9 [68-80]%) to > 99.8% (p = 0.028). During exercise, the CXE closed circuit improved median (IQR [range]) saturation from a baseline of 70.8% (63.8-74.5 [57-76]%) to 98.8% (96.5-100 [95-100]%) vs the open circuit improvement to 87.5%, (84.1-88.6 [82-89]%; p = 0.028). These data demonstrate the inverse relationship between supply and demand with open circuits and suggest that ambulatory closed circuits may offer twin advantages of supplying higher inspired oxygen concentrations and/or economy of gas use for exercising hypoxic adults.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Closed and open breathing circuit function in healthy volunteers during exercise at Mount Everest base camp (5300 m)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this