Co-creating a global shared research agenda on violence against women in low- and middle-income countries

Julienne Corboz*, Elizabeth Dartnall*, Chay Brown, Emma Fulu, Sarah Gordon, Mark Tomlinson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Despite a large growth in evidence on violence against women (VAW) over the last 25 years, VAW persists, as do gaps in the field’s knowledge of how to prevent and respond to it. To ensure that research on VAW in low- and middle-income countries (LIMCs) is addressing the most significant gaps in knowledge, and to prioritise evidence needs to reduce VAW and better support victims/survivors, the Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI) and Equality Institute (EQI) led a process of developing a global shared research agenda (GSRA) on VAW in LMICs.

Methods
The GSRA was developed through a six-stage adaptation of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method, which draws on the principle of the ‘wisdom of the crowd’. These steps included: a review of the literature on VAW in LMICs and development of domains; the generation of research questions within four domains by an Advisory Group; the consolidation of research questions; scoring of research questions by a Global Expert Group and the Advisory Group according to three criteria (applicability, effectiveness and equity); consultation and validation of the findings with the Advisory Group; and wide dissemination of the findings.

Results
The highest ranked research questions in the GSRA pertain to the domain of Intervention research, with some highly ranked questions also pertaining to the domain of Understanding VAW in its multiple forms. Questions under the other two domains, Improving existing interventions, and Methodological and measurement gaps, were not prioritised as highly by experts. There was strong consistency in top ranked research questions according to experts’ characteristics, albeit with some important differences according to experts’ gender, occupation and geographical location.

Conclusions
The GSRA findings suggest that currently the VAW field is shifting towards intervention research after several decades of building evidence on understanding VAW, including prevalence, drivers and impacts of violence. The findings also suggest a strong emphasis on under-served populations, and under-researched forms of VAW. Future priority setting exercises in LMICs that seek to decolonise knowledge should ensure that methodologies, and modalities of engagement, put diverse voices at the centre of engagement.

Original languageEnglish
Article number71
JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jun 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Research agenda
  • Violence prevention interventions
  • Violence response interventions
  • Research priority setting
  • Intimate partner violence
  • CHNRI method
  • Violence against women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Co-creating a global shared research agenda on violence against women in low- and middle-income countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this